Jubilee Properties v Warringah Council

PDF
Word
Highlights
Notes
Overview Full Text
Details
Case Agency Issuance Number Published Date

Jubilee Properties v Warringah Council

[2015] NSWLEC 1042

Tags

No tags available

Case

Jubilee Properties v Warringah Council

[2015] NSWLEC 1042

Land and Environment Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Jubilee Properties v Warringah Council [2015] NSWLEC 1042 Hearing dates:11-13 February 2015Decision date: 13 February 2015 Jurisdiction:Class 1Before: Morris C Decision: Appeal dismissed Catchwords: Development application: objection to development standard for height, Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act; Warringah Local Environmental Plan 2011; 26 State Environmental Planning Policy No 65 – Design Quality of Residential Flat Development; Standard Instrument—Principal Local Environmental Plan Cases Cited: Wehbe v Pittwater Council [2007] NSWLEC 827; Project Venture Developments v Pittwater Council [2005] NSWLEC 191; Schaffer Corporation v Hawkesbury City Council (1992) 77 LGRA 21 Texts Cited: Warringah Development Control Plan 2011; Residential Flat Design Code; Dee Why Town Centre Master Plan 2013 Category:Principal judgmentParties: Jubilee Properties (Applicant) Warringah Council (1st Respondent) Sydney East Joint Regional Planning Panel (2nd Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr I Hemmings SC (Applicant) Ms H Irish (2nd Respondent) Solicitors: Ms Rebecca Fleming Norton Rose Fulbright(Applicant) Mr A Gough Storey & Gough (1st Respondent) Ms D Holm (2nd Respondent) File Number(s):10395 of 2014Judgment Jubilee Properties lodged Development Application No 2013/1168 with Warringah Council seeking consent for demolition works and construction of a mixed use retail/commercial and residential development at Nos 697-701 Pittwater Road, Dee Why. A Voluntary Planning Agreement accompanies the application. Because the capital investment value of the project exceeds $20million, the Sydney East Joint Regional Planning Panel (JRPP) exercised the function of consent authority for the application. The JRPP refused consent, contrary to the recommendation of the council, and...

Continue reading the full case

Case content preview

Tags

No tags available

Case

Jubilee Properties v Warringah Council

[2015] NSWLEC 1042

Land and Environment Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Jubilee Properties v Warringah Council [2015] NSWLEC 1042 Hearing dates:11-13 February 2015Decision date: 13 February 2015 Jurisdiction:Class 1Before: Morris C Decision: Appeal dismissed Catchwords: Development application: objection to development standard for height, Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act; Warringah Local Environmental Plan 2011; 26 State Environmental Planning Policy No 65 – Design Quality of Residential Flat Development; Standard Instrument—Principal Local Environmental Plan Cases Cited: Wehbe v Pittwater Council [2007] NSWLEC 827; Project Venture Developments v Pittwater Council [2005] NSWLEC 191; Schaffer Corporation v Hawkesbury City Council (1992) 77 LGRA 21 Texts Cited: Warringah Development Control Plan 2011; Residential Flat Design Code; Dee Why Town Centre Master Plan 2013 Category:Principal judgmentParties: Jubilee Properties (Applicant) Warringah Council (1st Respondent) Sydney East Joint Regional Planning Panel (2nd Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr I Hemmings SC (Applicant) Ms H Irish (2nd Respondent) Solicitors: Ms Rebecca Fleming Norton Rose Fulbright(Applicant) Mr A Gough Storey & Gough (1st Respondent) Ms D Holm (2nd Respondent) File Number(s):10395 of 2014Judgment Jubilee Properties lodged Development Application No 2013/1168 with Warringah Council seeking consent for demolition works and construction of a mixed use retail/commercial and residential development at Nos 697-701 Pittwater Road, Dee Why. A Voluntary Planning Agreement accompanies the application. Because the capital investment value of the project exceeds $20million, the Sydney East Joint Regional Planning Panel (JRPP) exercised the function of consent authority for the application. The JRPP refused consent, contrary to the recommendation of the council, and...