{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Johnson v Hornsby Shire Council
Download as PDF
Download as Word
Highlights
My Notes
Collections
Create a New Collection
Overview
Full Text
{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Details
Case
Agency Issuance Number
Published Date
Johnson v Hornsby Shire Council
[2014] NSWLEC 1215
Tags
No tags available
Case
Johnson v Hornsby Shire Council
[2014] NSWLEC 1215
•
Land and Environment Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Johnson v Hornsby Shire Council [2014] NSWLEC 1215 Hearing dates:14-15 October 2014Decision date: 21 October 2014 Jurisdiction:Class 1Before: O'Neill C Decision: 1. The appeal is dismissed.2. Development Application No. DA 199/2014 for a new dwelling on proposed Lot 2 at 39 Hannah Street Beecroft, is refused.3. The exhibits, other than exhibits 1 and G, are returned. Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: construction of a new dwelling; height, floor area, privacy; and impact on remnant Blue Gum High Forest identified as critically endangered ecological community. Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Rural Fires Act 1997 Threatened Species Conservation Act 1995 Category:Principal judgmentParties: Mr Raymond Johnson (Applicant) Hornsby Shire Council (Respondent) Representation: David Baird Solicitor (Applicant) Adam Seton Solicitor (Respondent) HWL Ebsworth Lawyers (Applicant) Marsdens Law Group (Respondent) File Number(s):10562 of 2014 JudgmentCOMMISSIONER: This is an appeal pursuant to the provisions of s 97 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 against the refusal of Development Application No. 199/2014 for a new dwelling (the proposal) on proposed Lot 2 of 39 Hannah Street, Beecroft (the site) by Hornsby Council (the Council). The appeal was to be subject to mandatory conciliation on 14 October 2014 in accordance with the provisions of s34AA of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979, however, the parties advised, at the commencement of the proceedings on site, that there was no prospect of an agreement being reached and so the conciliation...
Continue reading the full case
Tags
No tags available
Case
Johnson v Hornsby Shire Council
[2014] NSWLEC 1215
•
Land and Environment Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Johnson v Hornsby Shire Council [2014] NSWLEC 1215 Hearing dates:14-15 October 2014Decision date: 21 October 2014 Jurisdiction:Class 1Before: O'Neill C Decision: 1. The appeal is dismissed.2. Development Application No. DA 199/2014 for a new dwelling on proposed Lot 2 at 39 Hannah Street Beecroft, is refused.3. The exhibits, other than exhibits 1 and G, are returned. Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: construction of a new dwelling; height, floor area, privacy; and impact on remnant Blue Gum High Forest identified as critically endangered ecological community. Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Rural Fires Act 1997 Threatened Species Conservation Act 1995 Category:Principal judgmentParties: Mr Raymond Johnson (Applicant) Hornsby Shire Council (Respondent) Representation: David Baird Solicitor (Applicant) Adam Seton Solicitor (Respondent) HWL Ebsworth Lawyers (Applicant) Marsdens Law Group (Respondent) File Number(s):10562 of 2014 JudgmentCOMMISSIONER: This is an appeal pursuant to the provisions of s 97 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 against the refusal of Development Application No. 199/2014 for a new dwelling (the proposal) on proposed Lot 2 of 39 Hannah Street, Beecroft (the site) by Hornsby Council (the Council). The appeal was to be subject to mandatory conciliation on 14 October 2014 in accordance with the provisions of s34AA of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979, however, the parties advised, at the commencement of the proceedings on site, that there was no prospect of an agreement being reached and so the conciliation...
showFlash = false, 6000)"
>