Hunt & Hunt Lawyers v Mitchell Morgan Nominees Pty Ltd [No 2]

HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIAFRENCH CJ,HAYNE AND KIEFEL JJHUNT & HUNT LAWYERS  APPELLANTANDMITCHELL MORGAN NOMINEES PTY LTD & ORS  RESPONDENTSHunt & Hunt Lawyers v Mitchell Morgan Nominees Pty Ltd [No 2][2013] HCA 2329 May 2013S270/2012ORDERIn addition to the orders of this Court made on 3 April 2013, further order that: "Order 12 of the orders dated 3 July 2009 made by Young JA in the Supreme Court of New South Wales be amended to read that there be judgment for the cross-claimants, Mitchell Morgan, against the cross-defendants, Hunt & Hunt Lawyers, in the sum of $311,870.24."On appeal from the Supreme Court of New South WalesNotice:  This copy of the Court's Reasons for Judgment is subject to formal revision prior to publication in the Commonwealth Law Reports.CATCHWORDSHunt & Hunt Lawyers v Mitchell Morgan Nominees Pty Ltd [No 2]Judgments and orders – Interest – Interest on judgment – Whether pre‑judgment interest, pursuant to s 100 of Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), or post-judgment interest, under s 101 of Civil Procedure Act, should apply to judgment sum. Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), ss 100, 101. FRENCH CJ, HAYNE AND KIEFEL JJ.   On 3 April 2013, this Court made orders in this matter allowing the appeal by Hunt & Hunt Lawyers ("Hunt & Hunt") from the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of New South Wales and substituting orders for those made by that Court.  The quantum of the judgment in favour of the first and second respondents (together "Mitchell Morgan") was not specified...