{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Helensburgh Coal Pty Ltd v Bartley
Download as PDF
Download as Word
Highlights
My Notes
Collections
Create a New Collection
Overview
Full Text
{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Details
Case
Agency Issuance Number
Published Date
Helensburgh Coal Pty Ltd v Bartley
[2025] HCA 29
Tags
No tags available
Case
Helensburgh Coal Pty Ltd v Bartley
[2025] HCA 29
•
HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIAGAGELER CJ,GORDON, EDELMAN, STEWARD AND BEECH‑JONES JJHELENSBURGH COAL PTY LTD APPELLANTANDNEIL BARTLEY AND OTHERS NAMED IN THE SCHEDULE RESPONDENTSHelensburgh Coal Pty Ltd v Bartley[2025] HCA 29Date of Hearing: 6 March 2025Date of Judgment: 6 August 2025S119/2024ORDERAppeal dismissed.On appeal from the Federal Court of AustraliaRepresentationB W Walker SC with A M Pomerenke KC and P M Zielinski for the appellant (instructed by MinterEllison)J T Gleeson SC with P A Boncardo for the first to twenty-second respondents (instructed by Mining and Energy Union)Submitting appearance for the twenty-third respondentNotice: This copy of the Court's Reasons for Judgment is subject to formal revision prior to publication in the Commonwealth Law Reports.CATCHWORDSHelensburgh Coal Pty Ltd v BartleyIndustrial law (Cth) – Unfair dismissal – Genuine redundancy – Where employer dismissed employees because of changes in operational requirements of employer's enterprise – Where employer continued to deploy contractors to perform work in employer's enterprise – Where s 389(2) of Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) provides dismissal not genuine redundancy if it would have been reasonable in all circumstances for person to be redeployed within employer's enterprise – Whether Fair Work Commission, in undertaking s 389(2) inquiry, permitted to inquire into whether employer could have made changes to its enterprise to create or make available position for otherwise redundant employee.Appeals – Standard of appellate review – Where Full Bench of Fair Work Commission applied House v The King standard of appellate review to review of decision that dismissals were not cases of genuine redundancy under...
Continue reading the full case
Tags
No tags available
Case
Helensburgh Coal Pty Ltd v Bartley
[2025] HCA 29
•
HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIAGAGELER CJ,GORDON, EDELMAN, STEWARD AND BEECH‑JONES JJHELENSBURGH COAL PTY LTD APPELLANTANDNEIL BARTLEY AND OTHERS NAMED IN THE SCHEDULE RESPONDENTSHelensburgh Coal Pty Ltd v Bartley[2025] HCA 29Date of Hearing: 6 March 2025Date of Judgment: 6 August 2025S119/2024ORDERAppeal dismissed.On appeal from the Federal Court of AustraliaRepresentationB W Walker SC with A M Pomerenke KC and P M Zielinski for the appellant (instructed by MinterEllison)J T Gleeson SC with P A Boncardo for the first to twenty-second respondents (instructed by Mining and Energy Union)Submitting appearance for the twenty-third respondentNotice: This copy of the Court's Reasons for Judgment is subject to formal revision prior to publication in the Commonwealth Law Reports.CATCHWORDSHelensburgh Coal Pty Ltd v BartleyIndustrial law (Cth) – Unfair dismissal – Genuine redundancy – Where employer dismissed employees because of changes in operational requirements of employer's enterprise – Where employer continued to deploy contractors to perform work in employer's enterprise – Where s 389(2) of Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) provides dismissal not genuine redundancy if it would have been reasonable in all circumstances for person to be redeployed within employer's enterprise – Whether Fair Work Commission, in undertaking s 389(2) inquiry, permitted to inquire into whether employer could have made changes to its enterprise to create or make available position for otherwise redundant employee.Appeals – Standard of appellate review – Where Full Bench of Fair Work Commission applied House v The King standard of appellate review to review of decision that dismissals were not cases of genuine redundancy under...
showFlash = false, 6000)"
>