Harrison v Perdikaris

PDF
Word
Highlights
Notes
Overview Full Text
Details
Case Agency Issuance Number Published Date

Harrison v Perdikaris

[2015] NSWLEC 99

Tags

No tags available

Case

Harrison v Perdikaris

[2015] NSWLEC 99

Land and Environment Court New South Wales Amendment notes Medium Neutral Citation: Harrison v Perdikaris [2015] NSWLEC 99 Hearing dates:26 May 2015Date of orders: 27 May 2015 Decision date: 27 May 2015 Jurisdiction:Class 5Before: Preston CJ Decision: Orders as at [115] Catchwords: OFFENCES AND PENALTIES – sentence – carrying out controlled activities in, on or under waterfront land without controlled activity approvals – offender counselled or procured contractors to increase capacity of two dams – objective seriousness of offences – no evidence that offences had impact on other persons’ rights under the Water Management Act – environmental harm was of moderate seriousness – practical measures to avoid environmental harm not taken – foreseeability of risk of environmental harm – control over causes giving rise to the offences – offences committed intentionally and with knowledge of illegality – offences not committed for financial gain – moderate overall objective seriousness – subjective circumstances of offender – record of prior convictions not aggravating factor – delayed pleas of guilty – offender’s genuine remorse for the offences – offender unlikely to reoffend – offender provided assistance to authorities – appropriate penalty is fine – offender ordered to pay prosecutor’s costs Legislation Cited: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 ss 3A, 21A, 22, 23 Criminal Procedure Act 1986 ss 257B, 257G Fines Act 1996 s 122 Protection of the Environment Administration Act 1991 s 6(2) Rivers and Foreshores Improvement Act 1948 Water Act 1912 Water Management Act 2000 ss 3, 52, 53, 55, 91E(1), 91(2), 92,...

Continue reading the full case

Case content preview

Tags

No tags available

Case

Harrison v Perdikaris

[2015] NSWLEC 99

Land and Environment Court New South Wales Amendment notes Medium Neutral Citation: Harrison v Perdikaris [2015] NSWLEC 99 Hearing dates:26 May 2015Date of orders: 27 May 2015 Decision date: 27 May 2015 Jurisdiction:Class 5Before: Preston CJ Decision: Orders as at [115] Catchwords: OFFENCES AND PENALTIES – sentence – carrying out controlled activities in, on or under waterfront land without controlled activity approvals – offender counselled or procured contractors to increase capacity of two dams – objective seriousness of offences – no evidence that offences had impact on other persons’ rights under the Water Management Act – environmental harm was of moderate seriousness – practical measures to avoid environmental harm not taken – foreseeability of risk of environmental harm – control over causes giving rise to the offences – offences committed intentionally and with knowledge of illegality – offences not committed for financial gain – moderate overall objective seriousness – subjective circumstances of offender – record of prior convictions not aggravating factor – delayed pleas of guilty – offender’s genuine remorse for the offences – offender unlikely to reoffend – offender provided assistance to authorities – appropriate penalty is fine – offender ordered to pay prosecutor’s costs Legislation Cited: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 ss 3A, 21A, 22, 23 Criminal Procedure Act 1986 ss 257B, 257G Fines Act 1996 s 122 Protection of the Environment Administration Act 1991 s 6(2) Rivers and Foreshores Improvement Act 1948 Water Act 1912 Water Management Act 2000 ss 3, 52, 53, 55, 91E(1), 91(2), 92,...