{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Harrison v Neuer
Download as PDF
Download as Word
Highlights
My Notes
Collections
Create a New Collection
Overview
Full Text
{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Details
Case
Agency Issuance Number
Published Date
Harrison v Neuer
[2015] NSWLEC 1098
Tags
No tags available
Case
Harrison v Neuer
[2015] NSWLEC 1098
•
Land and Environment Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Harrison & anor v Neuer & anor [2015] NSWLEC 1098 Hearing dates:15 April 2015Date of orders: 15 April 2015 Decision date: 15 April 2015 Jurisdiction:Class 2Before: Fakes C Decision: Application dismissed Catchwords: TREES [NEIGHBOURS] Damage to property, potential injury; threshold issue – tree not proven to be wholly or principally on adjoining land; actions of the parties, including the court, in attempting to clarify location. Legislation Cited: Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 Conveyancing Act 1919 Category:Principal judgmentParties: Robert and Jennifer Harrison (Applicants) Mark and Robyn Neuer (Respondents) Representation: Counsel: Applicants: Mr R Harrison (Litigant in person) Respondents: Mr J Kay (Solicitor) Solicitors: Respondents: Falvey Kay Lawyers File Number(s):20910 of 2014Judgment COMMISSIONER: On 29 October 2014 the applicants, who reside in Port Macquarie, lodged a Tree Dispute Application with the Local Court in that city. The application was then forwarded to the Land and Environment Court. The matter was listed for a directions hearing by telephone on 15 December 2014. The application is made pursuant to s 7 Part 2 of the Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2007 (the Trees Act). The orders sought by the applicants are as follows [as written]: 1. That the Respondents take responsibility for the Tree that is partially located on their property as is shown by the Surveyors plan & Report. (dated 20-10-09 and marked No.20.) and that they refrain from disposing of any branches or dead wood that should fall on their side...
Continue reading the full case
Tags
No tags available
Case
Harrison v Neuer
[2015] NSWLEC 1098
•
Land and Environment Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Harrison & anor v Neuer & anor [2015] NSWLEC 1098 Hearing dates:15 April 2015Date of orders: 15 April 2015 Decision date: 15 April 2015 Jurisdiction:Class 2Before: Fakes C Decision: Application dismissed Catchwords: TREES [NEIGHBOURS] Damage to property, potential injury; threshold issue – tree not proven to be wholly or principally on adjoining land; actions of the parties, including the court, in attempting to clarify location. Legislation Cited: Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 Conveyancing Act 1919 Category:Principal judgmentParties: Robert and Jennifer Harrison (Applicants) Mark and Robyn Neuer (Respondents) Representation: Counsel: Applicants: Mr R Harrison (Litigant in person) Respondents: Mr J Kay (Solicitor) Solicitors: Respondents: Falvey Kay Lawyers File Number(s):20910 of 2014Judgment COMMISSIONER: On 29 October 2014 the applicants, who reside in Port Macquarie, lodged a Tree Dispute Application with the Local Court in that city. The application was then forwarded to the Land and Environment Court. The matter was listed for a directions hearing by telephone on 15 December 2014. The application is made pursuant to s 7 Part 2 of the Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2007 (the Trees Act). The orders sought by the applicants are as follows [as written]: 1. That the Respondents take responsibility for the Tree that is partially located on their property as is shown by the Surveyors plan & Report. (dated 20-10-09 and marked No.20.) and that they refrain from disposing of any branches or dead wood that should fall on their side...
showFlash = false, 6000)"
>