{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Halloran v Minister Administering National Parks and Wildlife Act 1974
Download as PDF
Download as Word
Highlights
My Notes
Collections
Create a New Collection
Overview
Full Text
{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Details
Case
Agency Issuance Number
Published Date
Halloran v Minister Administering National Parks and Wildlife Act 1974
[2006] HCA 3
Tags
No tags available
Case
Halloran v Minister Administering National Parks and Wildlife Act 1974
[2006] HCA 3
•
HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIAGLEESON CJ,GUMMOW, KIRBY, HAYNE AND HEYDON JJWARREN HALLORAN AND THE PERSONS NOMINATED IN THE ATTACHED SCHEDULE OF OWNERSHIP APPELLANTSANDMINISTER ADMINISTERING NATIONAL PARKS AND WILDLIFE ACT 1974 RESPONDENTHalloran v Minister Administering National Parks and Wildlife Act 1974 [2006] HCA 39 February 2006S215/2005ORDER1.Vary Order 2 of the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of New South Wales entered on 17 August 2004, so as to read:"Declare that upon the admissible evidence tendered at the proceeding before Talbot J the applicant, Pacinette Pty Ltd, has not established that it is the owner of an interest in the land the subject of the Notice of Acquisition published in the Government Gazette dated 19 June 1998 and is entitled for the purposes of these proceedings to maintain its claim under s 37 of the Land Acquisition (Just Terms Compensation) Act 1991 in respect of nominated lots 140, 1629 and 1063."2.Vary Order 3 of the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of New South Wales entered on 17 August 2004, so as to read:"Declare that upon the admissible evidence tendered at the proceeding before Talbot J, the Beneficial Ownership Claimants in Class 2 referred to in the Amended Points of Claim dated 28 December 2000 have not established that they are entitled to maintain claims under s 37 of the Land Acquisition (Just Terms Compensation) Act 1991 in respect of land resumed by Notices of Acquisition published in the Government Gazette on 19 June 1998 and on 18 September 1998."3. Otherwise,...
Continue reading the full case
Tags
No tags available
Case
Halloran v Minister Administering National Parks and Wildlife Act 1974
[2006] HCA 3
•
HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIAGLEESON CJ,GUMMOW, KIRBY, HAYNE AND HEYDON JJWARREN HALLORAN AND THE PERSONS NOMINATED IN THE ATTACHED SCHEDULE OF OWNERSHIP APPELLANTSANDMINISTER ADMINISTERING NATIONAL PARKS AND WILDLIFE ACT 1974 RESPONDENTHalloran v Minister Administering National Parks and Wildlife Act 1974 [2006] HCA 39 February 2006S215/2005ORDER1.Vary Order 2 of the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of New South Wales entered on 17 August 2004, so as to read:"Declare that upon the admissible evidence tendered at the proceeding before Talbot J the applicant, Pacinette Pty Ltd, has not established that it is the owner of an interest in the land the subject of the Notice of Acquisition published in the Government Gazette dated 19 June 1998 and is entitled for the purposes of these proceedings to maintain its claim under s 37 of the Land Acquisition (Just Terms Compensation) Act 1991 in respect of nominated lots 140, 1629 and 1063."2.Vary Order 3 of the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of New South Wales entered on 17 August 2004, so as to read:"Declare that upon the admissible evidence tendered at the proceeding before Talbot J, the Beneficial Ownership Claimants in Class 2 referred to in the Amended Points of Claim dated 28 December 2000 have not established that they are entitled to maintain claims under s 37 of the Land Acquisition (Just Terms Compensation) Act 1991 in respect of land resumed by Notices of Acquisition published in the Government Gazette on 19 June 1998 and on 18 September 1998."3. Otherwise,...
showFlash = false, 6000)"
>