{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Grey v The Queen
Download as PDF
Download as Word
Highlights
My Notes
Collections
Create a New Collection
Overview
Full Text
{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Details
Case
Agency Issuance Number
Published Date
Grey v The Queen
[2001] HCA 65
Tags
No tags available
Case
Grey v The Queen
[2001] HCA 65
•
HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIAGLEESON CJ,GUMMOW, KIRBY, HAYNE AND CALLINAN JJANTHONY STEPHEN GREY APPELLANTANDTHE QUEEN RESPONDENTGrey v The Queen [2001] HCA 6515 November 2001S2/2001ORDER1.Appeal allowed.2.Set aside the order of the Court of Criminal Appeal of New South Wales dated 3 March 2000 and in lieu thereof order that:a) the appellant’s appeal to that Court be allowed;b) the appellant’s convictions be quashed and a new trial be had of each of the counts of which he was convicted.On appeal from the Supreme Court of New South WalesRepresentation:P Byrne SC with P J D Hamill and T S Corish for the appellant (instructed by Legal Aid Commission of New South Wales)N R Cowdery QC with A M Blackmore for the respondent (instructed by S E O'Connor, Solicitor for Public Prosecutions)Notice: This copy of the Court's Reasons for Judgment is subject to formal revision prior to publication in the Commonwealth Law Reports.CATCHWORDSGrey v The QueenCriminal law – Evidence – Crown witness with prior convictions – Accused unaware that Crown witness had received favourable treatment by the Crown in consideration of testimony against the accused – Whether absence of disclosure to the accused of the favourable treatment of the Crown witness caused the trial of the accused to miscarry – Substantial miscarriage of justice. Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), s 165(1)(d), (2).Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), s 6(1).GLEESON CJ, GUMMOW AND CALLINAN JJ. The issue in this case is whether a criminal trial miscarried because the accused was not provided with a copy of a letter...
Continue reading the full case
Tags
No tags available
Case
Grey v The Queen
[2001] HCA 65
•
HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIAGLEESON CJ,GUMMOW, KIRBY, HAYNE AND CALLINAN JJANTHONY STEPHEN GREY APPELLANTANDTHE QUEEN RESPONDENTGrey v The Queen [2001] HCA 6515 November 2001S2/2001ORDER1.Appeal allowed.2.Set aside the order of the Court of Criminal Appeal of New South Wales dated 3 March 2000 and in lieu thereof order that:a) the appellant’s appeal to that Court be allowed;b) the appellant’s convictions be quashed and a new trial be had of each of the counts of which he was convicted.On appeal from the Supreme Court of New South WalesRepresentation:P Byrne SC with P J D Hamill and T S Corish for the appellant (instructed by Legal Aid Commission of New South Wales)N R Cowdery QC with A M Blackmore for the respondent (instructed by S E O'Connor, Solicitor for Public Prosecutions)Notice: This copy of the Court's Reasons for Judgment is subject to formal revision prior to publication in the Commonwealth Law Reports.CATCHWORDSGrey v The QueenCriminal law – Evidence – Crown witness with prior convictions – Accused unaware that Crown witness had received favourable treatment by the Crown in consideration of testimony against the accused – Whether absence of disclosure to the accused of the favourable treatment of the Crown witness caused the trial of the accused to miscarry – Substantial miscarriage of justice. Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), s 165(1)(d), (2).Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), s 6(1).GLEESON CJ, GUMMOW AND CALLINAN JJ. The issue in this case is whether a criminal trial miscarried because the accused was not provided with a copy of a letter...
showFlash = false, 6000)"
>