Government of the Russian Federation v Commonwealth of Australia

PDF
Word
Highlights
Notes
Overview Full Text
Details
Case Agency Issuance Number Published Date

Government of the Russian Federation v Commonwealth of Australia

[2023] HCA 20

Tags

No tags available

Case

Government of the Russian Federation v Commonwealth of Australia

[2023] HCA 20

HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIAJAGOT JGOVERNMENT OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION                PLAINTIFFANDCOMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA  DEFENDANTGovernment of the Russian Federation v Commonwealth of Australia[2023] HCA 20Date of Hearing: 26 June 2023Date of Judgment: 26 June 2023C9/2023ORDER1.The application filed 23 June 2023 be dismissed.2.The costs of the application filed 23 June 2023 be costs in the cause.RepresentationE A J Hyde with M F Caristo for the plaintiff (instructed by Nelson & Hill Lawyers)T M Begbie KC with E H I Smith for the defendant (instructed by Australian Government Solicitor)Notice:  This copy of the Court's Reasons for Judgment is subject to formal revision prior to publication in the Commonwealth Law Reports.CATCHWORDSGovernment of the Russian Federation v Commonwealth of AustraliaInjunctions – Interlocutory injunctions – Where plaintiff's lease of land terminated by operation of Home Affairs Act 2023 (Cth) ("Act") – Where plaintiff seeks declaration of constitutional invalidity of Act on ground Act not supported by head of legislative power and contrary to s 51(xxxi) of Constitution – Where plaintiff seeks alternative declaration that operation of Act results in acquisition of property to which s 51(xxxi) of Constitution applies from plaintiff otherwise than on just terms, such that Commonwealth liable to pay reasonable amount of compensation to plaintiff – Whether plaintiff established prima facie case or serious question to be tried – Whether, on balance of convenience, compelling circumstances existed supporting interlocutory injunction to restrain enforcement of statute.Words and phrases – "acquisition of property", "balance of convenience", "compelling grounds", "material change in circumstances", "national security interests", "on...

Continue reading the full case

Case content preview

Tags

No tags available

Case

Government of the Russian Federation v Commonwealth of Australia

[2023] HCA 20

HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIAJAGOT JGOVERNMENT OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION                PLAINTIFFANDCOMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA  DEFENDANTGovernment of the Russian Federation v Commonwealth of Australia[2023] HCA 20Date of Hearing: 26 June 2023Date of Judgment: 26 June 2023C9/2023ORDER1.The application filed 23 June 2023 be dismissed.2.The costs of the application filed 23 June 2023 be costs in the cause.RepresentationE A J Hyde with M F Caristo for the plaintiff (instructed by Nelson & Hill Lawyers)T M Begbie KC with E H I Smith for the defendant (instructed by Australian Government Solicitor)Notice:  This copy of the Court's Reasons for Judgment is subject to formal revision prior to publication in the Commonwealth Law Reports.CATCHWORDSGovernment of the Russian Federation v Commonwealth of AustraliaInjunctions – Interlocutory injunctions – Where plaintiff's lease of land terminated by operation of Home Affairs Act 2023 (Cth) ("Act") – Where plaintiff seeks declaration of constitutional invalidity of Act on ground Act not supported by head of legislative power and contrary to s 51(xxxi) of Constitution – Where plaintiff seeks alternative declaration that operation of Act results in acquisition of property to which s 51(xxxi) of Constitution applies from plaintiff otherwise than on just terms, such that Commonwealth liable to pay reasonable amount of compensation to plaintiff – Whether plaintiff established prima facie case or serious question to be tried – Whether, on balance of convenience, compelling circumstances existed supporting interlocutory injunction to restrain enforcement of statute.Words and phrases – "acquisition of property", "balance of convenience", "compelling grounds", "material change in circumstances", "national security interests", "on...