{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Government of the Russian Federation v Commonwealth of Australia
Download as PDF
Download as Word
Highlights
My Notes
Collections
Create a New Collection
Overview
Full Text
{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Details
Case
Agency Issuance Number
Published Date
Government of the Russian Federation v Commonwealth of Australia
[2023] HCA 20
Tags
No tags available
Case
Government of the Russian Federation v Commonwealth of Australia
[2023] HCA 20
•
HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIAJAGOT JGOVERNMENT OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION PLAINTIFFANDCOMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA DEFENDANTGovernment of the Russian Federation v Commonwealth of Australia[2023] HCA 20Date of Hearing: 26 June 2023Date of Judgment: 26 June 2023C9/2023ORDER1.The application filed 23 June 2023 be dismissed.2.The costs of the application filed 23 June 2023 be costs in the cause.RepresentationE A J Hyde with M F Caristo for the plaintiff (instructed by Nelson & Hill Lawyers)T M Begbie KC with E H I Smith for the defendant (instructed by Australian Government Solicitor)Notice: This copy of the Court's Reasons for Judgment is subject to formal revision prior to publication in the Commonwealth Law Reports.CATCHWORDSGovernment of the Russian Federation v Commonwealth of AustraliaInjunctions – Interlocutory injunctions – Where plaintiff's lease of land terminated by operation of Home Affairs Act 2023 (Cth) ("Act") – Where plaintiff seeks declaration of constitutional invalidity of Act on ground Act not supported by head of legislative power and contrary to s 51(xxxi) of Constitution – Where plaintiff seeks alternative declaration that operation of Act results in acquisition of property to which s 51(xxxi) of Constitution applies from plaintiff otherwise than on just terms, such that Commonwealth liable to pay reasonable amount of compensation to plaintiff – Whether plaintiff established prima facie case or serious question to be tried – Whether, on balance of convenience, compelling circumstances existed supporting interlocutory injunction to restrain enforcement of statute.Words and phrases – "acquisition of property", "balance of convenience", "compelling grounds", "material change in circumstances", "national security interests", "on...
Continue reading the full case
Tags
No tags available
Case
Government of the Russian Federation v Commonwealth of Australia
[2023] HCA 20
•
HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIAJAGOT JGOVERNMENT OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION PLAINTIFFANDCOMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA DEFENDANTGovernment of the Russian Federation v Commonwealth of Australia[2023] HCA 20Date of Hearing: 26 June 2023Date of Judgment: 26 June 2023C9/2023ORDER1.The application filed 23 June 2023 be dismissed.2.The costs of the application filed 23 June 2023 be costs in the cause.RepresentationE A J Hyde with M F Caristo for the plaintiff (instructed by Nelson & Hill Lawyers)T M Begbie KC with E H I Smith for the defendant (instructed by Australian Government Solicitor)Notice: This copy of the Court's Reasons for Judgment is subject to formal revision prior to publication in the Commonwealth Law Reports.CATCHWORDSGovernment of the Russian Federation v Commonwealth of AustraliaInjunctions – Interlocutory injunctions – Where plaintiff's lease of land terminated by operation of Home Affairs Act 2023 (Cth) ("Act") – Where plaintiff seeks declaration of constitutional invalidity of Act on ground Act not supported by head of legislative power and contrary to s 51(xxxi) of Constitution – Where plaintiff seeks alternative declaration that operation of Act results in acquisition of property to which s 51(xxxi) of Constitution applies from plaintiff otherwise than on just terms, such that Commonwealth liable to pay reasonable amount of compensation to plaintiff – Whether plaintiff established prima facie case or serious question to be tried – Whether, on balance of convenience, compelling circumstances existed supporting interlocutory injunction to restrain enforcement of statute.Words and phrases – "acquisition of property", "balance of convenience", "compelling grounds", "material change in circumstances", "national security interests", "on...
showFlash = false, 6000)"
>