{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Google Inc v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission
Download as PDF
Download as Word
Highlights
My Notes
Collections
Create a New Collection
Overview
Full Text
{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Details
Case
Agency Issuance Number
Published Date
Google Inc v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission
[2013] HCA 1
Tags
No tags available
Case
Google Inc v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission
[2013] HCA 1
•
HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIAFRENCH CJ,HAYNE, HEYDON, CRENNAN AND KIEFEL JJGOOGLE INC APPELLANTANDAUSTRALIAN COMPETITION AND CONSUMER COMMISSION RESPONDENTGoogle Inc v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission[2013] HCA 16 February 2013S175/2012ORDER1. Appeal allowed with costs. 2. Set aside the orders of the Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia made on 3 April 2012 and the orders of the Federal Court of Australia made on 4 May 2012 and, in their place, order that the appeal to the Full Court be dismissed with costs.On appeal from the Federal Court of AustraliaRepresentationA J L Bannon SC with C Dimitriadis for the appellant (instructed by Gilbert + Tobin)S T White SC with K C Morgan for the respondent (instructed by Corrs Chambers Westgarth)Notice: This copy of the Court's Reasons for Judgment is subject to formal revision prior to publication in the Commonwealth Law Reports.CATCHWORDSGoogle Inc v Australian Competition and Consumer CommissionTrade practices – Misleading or deceptive conduct – Search engine operator displayed "sponsored links" on search results page – Sponsored links created by or at direction of advertisers – Sponsored links comprised advertising text which directed users to web sites of advertisers' choosing – Whether search engine operator engaged in misleading or deceptive conduct by publishing or displaying sponsored links which contained misleading representations made by advertisers – Whether search engine operator adopted or endorsed misleading representations.Words and phrases – "adoption", "endorsement", "intermediary", "misleading or deceptive conduct", "misleading representation".Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth), ss 52, 85(3).FRENCH CJ, CRENNAN AND KIEFEL JJ. The appellant, Google...
Continue reading the full case
Tags
No tags available
Case
Google Inc v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission
[2013] HCA 1
•
HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIAFRENCH CJ,HAYNE, HEYDON, CRENNAN AND KIEFEL JJGOOGLE INC APPELLANTANDAUSTRALIAN COMPETITION AND CONSUMER COMMISSION RESPONDENTGoogle Inc v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission[2013] HCA 16 February 2013S175/2012ORDER1. Appeal allowed with costs. 2. Set aside the orders of the Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia made on 3 April 2012 and the orders of the Federal Court of Australia made on 4 May 2012 and, in their place, order that the appeal to the Full Court be dismissed with costs.On appeal from the Federal Court of AustraliaRepresentationA J L Bannon SC with C Dimitriadis for the appellant (instructed by Gilbert + Tobin)S T White SC with K C Morgan for the respondent (instructed by Corrs Chambers Westgarth)Notice: This copy of the Court's Reasons for Judgment is subject to formal revision prior to publication in the Commonwealth Law Reports.CATCHWORDSGoogle Inc v Australian Competition and Consumer CommissionTrade practices – Misleading or deceptive conduct – Search engine operator displayed "sponsored links" on search results page – Sponsored links created by or at direction of advertisers – Sponsored links comprised advertising text which directed users to web sites of advertisers' choosing – Whether search engine operator engaged in misleading or deceptive conduct by publishing or displaying sponsored links which contained misleading representations made by advertisers – Whether search engine operator adopted or endorsed misleading representations.Words and phrases – "adoption", "endorsement", "intermediary", "misleading or deceptive conduct", "misleading representation".Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth), ss 52, 85(3).FRENCH CJ, CRENNAN AND KIEFEL JJ. The appellant, Google...
showFlash = false, 6000)"
>