{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Fenwick v Woodside Properties Pty Ltd
Download as PDF
Download as Word
Highlights
My Notes
Collections
Create a New Collection
Overview
Full Text
{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Details
Case
Agency Issuance Number
Published Date
Fenwick v Woodside Properties Pty Ltd
[2016] NSWLEC 104
Tags
No tags available
Case
Fenwick v Woodside Properties Pty Ltd
[2016] NSWLEC 104
•
Land and Environment Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Fenwick v Woodside Properties Pty Ltd [2016] NSWLEC 104 Hearing dates:15 August 2016Date of orders: 15 August 2016 Decision date: 16 August 2016 Jurisdiction:Class 4Before: Pepper J Decision: See orders at [28] Catchwords: JUDICIAL REVIEW: whether failure to notify modification applications to an existing development consent as required by law a jurisdictional error resulting in the invalidity of approvals – if so, whether subsequent modification approval taking into account the earlier invalid modification approvals also invalid – declarations made – costs reserved. Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 s 96(2) Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulations 2000 reg 119(2) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 r 59.10 Cases Cited: Csillag v Woollahra Council [2011] NSWLEC 17; (2011) 181 LGERA 141 Hollis v Shellharbour City Council [2002] NSWLEC 83 Manning v Bathurst Regional Council (No 2) [2013] NSWLEC 186; (2013) 199 LGERA 147 Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko-Wallsend Ltd [1986] HCA 40; (1986) 162 CLR 24 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Bhardwaj [2002] HCA 11; (2002) 209 CLR 597 Tweed Business and Residents Focus Group Inc v Northern Region Joint Regional Planning Panel [2012] NSWLEC 166 Category:Principal judgmentParties: Christine Fenwick (Applicant) Woodside Properties Pty Ltd (First Respondent) Rochester Estate Pty Limited (Second Respondent) Wingecarribee Shire Council (Third Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr P Clay SC and N Hammond (Applicant) Mr P Rigg, solicitor (Respondent) Solicitors: Hones Lawyers Pty Ltd (Applicant) P Rigg (First and Second Respondents) Swaab Attorneys (Third...
Continue reading the full case
Tags
No tags available
Case
Fenwick v Woodside Properties Pty Ltd
[2016] NSWLEC 104
•
Land and Environment Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Fenwick v Woodside Properties Pty Ltd [2016] NSWLEC 104 Hearing dates:15 August 2016Date of orders: 15 August 2016 Decision date: 16 August 2016 Jurisdiction:Class 4Before: Pepper J Decision: See orders at [28] Catchwords: JUDICIAL REVIEW: whether failure to notify modification applications to an existing development consent as required by law a jurisdictional error resulting in the invalidity of approvals – if so, whether subsequent modification approval taking into account the earlier invalid modification approvals also invalid – declarations made – costs reserved. Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 s 96(2) Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulations 2000 reg 119(2) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 r 59.10 Cases Cited: Csillag v Woollahra Council [2011] NSWLEC 17; (2011) 181 LGERA 141 Hollis v Shellharbour City Council [2002] NSWLEC 83 Manning v Bathurst Regional Council (No 2) [2013] NSWLEC 186; (2013) 199 LGERA 147 Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko-Wallsend Ltd [1986] HCA 40; (1986) 162 CLR 24 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Bhardwaj [2002] HCA 11; (2002) 209 CLR 597 Tweed Business and Residents Focus Group Inc v Northern Region Joint Regional Planning Panel [2012] NSWLEC 166 Category:Principal judgmentParties: Christine Fenwick (Applicant) Woodside Properties Pty Ltd (First Respondent) Rochester Estate Pty Limited (Second Respondent) Wingecarribee Shire Council (Third Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr P Clay SC and N Hammond (Applicant) Mr P Rigg, solicitor (Respondent) Solicitors: Hones Lawyers Pty Ltd (Applicant) P Rigg (First and Second Respondents) Swaab Attorneys (Third...
showFlash = false, 6000)"
>