{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Eunomia Development Pty Limited v Sydney City Council
Download as PDF
Download as Word
Highlights
My Notes
Collections
Create a New Collection
Overview
Full Text
{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Details
Case
Agency Issuance Number
Published Date
Eunomia Development Pty Limited v Sydney City Council
[2016] NSWLEC 1342
Tags
No tags available
Case
Eunomia Development Pty Limited v Sydney City Council
[2016] NSWLEC 1342
•
Land and Environment Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Eunomia Development Pty Limited v Sydney City Council [2016] NSWLEC 1342 Hearing dates:10 August 2016Date of orders: 18 August 2016 Decision date: 18 August 2016 Jurisdiction:Class 1Before: Morris C Decision: Appeal upheld Catchwords: CONSENT ORDERS: mixed use development, matters raised by objectors; compliance with planning controls, overshadowing, privacy, traffic and parking Legislation Cited: Sydney Local Environmental Plan 2012; State Environmental Planning Policy No 65 – Design Quality of Residential Flat Development Texts Cited: Sydney Development Control Plan 2012; Residential Flat Design Code Category:Principal judgmentParties: Eunomia Developments Pty Limited (Applicant) Sydney City Council (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr C McEwen SC (Applicant) Mr M Seymour (Respondent) Solicitors: Ms A Cowper Mills Oakley (Applicant) Mr A Simpson Sydney City Council (Respondent) File Number(s):155927 of 2016Judgment Eunomia Developments Pty Limited (Eunomia) lodged Development Application D/2015/1239 with Sydney City Council (council) on 28 August 2015 seeking consent for the adaptive re-use of a 2 storey building at the northern corner of the site to include residential apartments, demolition of 2 existing warehouses at the southern end of the site and construction of a a 4 storey residential flat building over a new 2 level basement for 39 vehicles. The total number of apartments proposed was 30. The council had not determined the application within the prescribed period and Eunomia is appealing its deemed refusal. Following a conciliation conference the applicant prepared amended plans and was granted leave by the Court to rely on those plans...
Continue reading the full case
Tags
No tags available
Case
Eunomia Development Pty Limited v Sydney City Council
[2016] NSWLEC 1342
•
Land and Environment Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Eunomia Development Pty Limited v Sydney City Council [2016] NSWLEC 1342 Hearing dates:10 August 2016Date of orders: 18 August 2016 Decision date: 18 August 2016 Jurisdiction:Class 1Before: Morris C Decision: Appeal upheld Catchwords: CONSENT ORDERS: mixed use development, matters raised by objectors; compliance with planning controls, overshadowing, privacy, traffic and parking Legislation Cited: Sydney Local Environmental Plan 2012; State Environmental Planning Policy No 65 – Design Quality of Residential Flat Development Texts Cited: Sydney Development Control Plan 2012; Residential Flat Design Code Category:Principal judgmentParties: Eunomia Developments Pty Limited (Applicant) Sydney City Council (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr C McEwen SC (Applicant) Mr M Seymour (Respondent) Solicitors: Ms A Cowper Mills Oakley (Applicant) Mr A Simpson Sydney City Council (Respondent) File Number(s):155927 of 2016Judgment Eunomia Developments Pty Limited (Eunomia) lodged Development Application D/2015/1239 with Sydney City Council (council) on 28 August 2015 seeking consent for the adaptive re-use of a 2 storey building at the northern corner of the site to include residential apartments, demolition of 2 existing warehouses at the southern end of the site and construction of a a 4 storey residential flat building over a new 2 level basement for 39 vehicles. The total number of apartments proposed was 30. The council had not determined the application within the prescribed period and Eunomia is appealing its deemed refusal. Following a conciliation conference the applicant prepared amended plans and was granted leave by the Court to rely on those plans...
showFlash = false, 6000)"
>