{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Elisha v Vision Australia Limited
Download as PDF
Download as Word
Highlights
My Notes
Collections
Create a New Collection
Overview
Full Text
{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Details
Case
Agency Issuance Number
Published Date
Elisha v Vision Australia Limited
[2024] HCA 50
Tags
No tags available
Case
Elisha v Vision Australia Limited
[2024] HCA 50
•
HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIAGAGELER CJ,GORDON, EDELMAN, STEWARD, GLEESON, JAGOT AND BEECH‑JONES JJADAM ELISHA APPELLANTANDVISION AUSTRALIA LIMITED RESPONDENTElisha v Vision Australia Limited[2024] HCA 50Date of Hearing: 16 October 2024Date of Judgment: 11 December 2024M22/2024ORDER1.Appeal allowed with costs.2.Set aside orders 2 to 6 of the orders of the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of Victoria made on 28 November 2023 and, in their place, order that the appeal be dismissed with costs.On appeal from the Supreme Court of VictoriaRepresentationP D Herzfeld SC with E Makowski and S D D Puttick for the appellant (instructed by Arnold Thomas & Becker Lawyers)P M O'Grady KC and S E Gladman SC with L R Howard for the respondent (instructed by IDP Lawyers)Notice: This copy of the Court's Reasons for Judgment is subject to formal revision prior to publication in the Commonwealth Law Reports.CATCHWORDSElisha v Vision Australia Limited Damages – Assessment – Breach of contract – Scope of contractual duty – Remoteness – Where appellant employed by respondent – Where incident involving appellant occurred during travel for appellant's work duties – Where appellant provided with "stand down letter" outlining allegations arising from incident – Where previous reports of appellant's aggressive behaviour – Where disciplinary meeting held for appellant to respond to allegations in stand down letter – Where employment terminated – Where decision to terminate employment based upon allegations of previous aggressive behaviour not put to appellant contrary to respondent's disciplinary procedure – Where appellant diagnosed with major depressive disorder – Whether liability for...
Continue reading the full case
Tags
No tags available
Case
Elisha v Vision Australia Limited
[2024] HCA 50
•
HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIAGAGELER CJ,GORDON, EDELMAN, STEWARD, GLEESON, JAGOT AND BEECH‑JONES JJADAM ELISHA APPELLANTANDVISION AUSTRALIA LIMITED RESPONDENTElisha v Vision Australia Limited[2024] HCA 50Date of Hearing: 16 October 2024Date of Judgment: 11 December 2024M22/2024ORDER1.Appeal allowed with costs.2.Set aside orders 2 to 6 of the orders of the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of Victoria made on 28 November 2023 and, in their place, order that the appeal be dismissed with costs.On appeal from the Supreme Court of VictoriaRepresentationP D Herzfeld SC with E Makowski and S D D Puttick for the appellant (instructed by Arnold Thomas & Becker Lawyers)P M O'Grady KC and S E Gladman SC with L R Howard for the respondent (instructed by IDP Lawyers)Notice: This copy of the Court's Reasons for Judgment is subject to formal revision prior to publication in the Commonwealth Law Reports.CATCHWORDSElisha v Vision Australia Limited Damages – Assessment – Breach of contract – Scope of contractual duty – Remoteness – Where appellant employed by respondent – Where incident involving appellant occurred during travel for appellant's work duties – Where appellant provided with "stand down letter" outlining allegations arising from incident – Where previous reports of appellant's aggressive behaviour – Where disciplinary meeting held for appellant to respond to allegations in stand down letter – Where employment terminated – Where decision to terminate employment based upon allegations of previous aggressive behaviour not put to appellant contrary to respondent's disciplinary procedure – Where appellant diagnosed with major depressive disorder – Whether liability for...
showFlash = false, 6000)"
>