{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
DL v The Queen
Download as PDF
Download as Word
Highlights
My Notes
Collections
Create a New Collection
Overview
Full Text
{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Details
Case
Agency Issuance Number
Published Date
DL v The Queen
[2018] HCA 32
Tags
No tags available
Case
DL v The Queen
[2018] HCA 32
•
HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIABELL, KEANE, NETTLE, GORDON AND EDELMAN JJDL APPELLANTANDTHE QUEEN RESPONDENTDL v The Queen[2018] HCA 328 August 2018S309/2017ORDER1.Appeal allowed.2.Set aside order 3 of the Court of Criminal Appeal of the Supreme Court of New South Wales made on 13 April 2017 in the appeal against sentence. 3.Remit the proceeding to the Court of Criminal Appeal of the Supreme Court of New South Wales for determination of the appeal against sentence.On appeal from the Supreme Court of New South WalesRepresentationG A Bashir SC with G E L Huxley for the appellant (instructed by Matouk Joyner Solicitors)K N Shead SC with T L Smith for the respondent (instructed by Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (NSW)) Notice: This copy of the Court's Reasons for Judgment is subject to formal revision prior to publication in the Commonwealth Law Reports.CATCHWORDS DL v The QueenCriminal law – Appeal against sentence – Where appellant convicted of murder – Where primary judge found it probable that appellant acting under influence of some psychosis at time of offence – Where primary judge not satisfied appellant possessed intention to kill – Where primary judge's discretion miscarried by giving primary significance to standard non-parole period – Where Court of Criminal Appeal excised power to re-sentence – Where prosecutor conceded there was no issue with primary judge's factual findings – Where Court of Criminal Appeal found primary judge's findings open – Where Court of Criminal Appeal rejected primary judge's finding that appellant had suffered temporary psychosis which precluded forming intention to...
Continue reading the full case
Tags
No tags available
Case
DL v The Queen
[2018] HCA 32
•
HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIABELL, KEANE, NETTLE, GORDON AND EDELMAN JJDL APPELLANTANDTHE QUEEN RESPONDENTDL v The Queen[2018] HCA 328 August 2018S309/2017ORDER1.Appeal allowed.2.Set aside order 3 of the Court of Criminal Appeal of the Supreme Court of New South Wales made on 13 April 2017 in the appeal against sentence. 3.Remit the proceeding to the Court of Criminal Appeal of the Supreme Court of New South Wales for determination of the appeal against sentence.On appeal from the Supreme Court of New South WalesRepresentationG A Bashir SC with G E L Huxley for the appellant (instructed by Matouk Joyner Solicitors)K N Shead SC with T L Smith for the respondent (instructed by Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (NSW)) Notice: This copy of the Court's Reasons for Judgment is subject to formal revision prior to publication in the Commonwealth Law Reports.CATCHWORDS DL v The QueenCriminal law – Appeal against sentence – Where appellant convicted of murder – Where primary judge found it probable that appellant acting under influence of some psychosis at time of offence – Where primary judge not satisfied appellant possessed intention to kill – Where primary judge's discretion miscarried by giving primary significance to standard non-parole period – Where Court of Criminal Appeal excised power to re-sentence – Where prosecutor conceded there was no issue with primary judge's factual findings – Where Court of Criminal Appeal found primary judge's findings open – Where Court of Criminal Appeal rejected primary judge's finding that appellant had suffered temporary psychosis which precluded forming intention to...
showFlash = false, 6000)"
>