{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Decon Australia Pty Limited v The Hills Shire Council
Download as PDF
Download as Word
Highlights
My Notes
Collections
Create a New Collection
Overview
Full Text
{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Details
Case
Agency Issuance Number
Published Date
Decon Australia Pty Limited v The Hills Shire Council
[2015] NSWLEC 1260
Tags
No tags available
Case
Decon Australia Pty Limited v The Hills Shire Council
[2015] NSWLEC 1260
•
Land and Environment Court New South Wales Case Name: Decon Australia Pty Limited v The Hills Shire Council Medium Neutral Citation: [2015] NSWLEC 1260 Hearing Date(s): Conciliation conference 5 May 2015 Date of Orders: 13 July 2015 Decision Date: 13 July 2015 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Tuor C Decision: See (4) below Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION:; conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Decon Australia Pty Limited (Applicant) The Hills Shire Council (Respondent) Representation: Solicitors: Mr P Jackson of Pikes & Verekers Lawyers (Applicant) Mr A Hudson of Wilshire Webb Staunton Beattie (Respondent) File Number(s): 10062 of 2015 JUDGMENTCOMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.In making the...
Continue reading the full case
Tags
No tags available
Case
Decon Australia Pty Limited v The Hills Shire Council
[2015] NSWLEC 1260
•
Land and Environment Court New South Wales Case Name: Decon Australia Pty Limited v The Hills Shire Council Medium Neutral Citation: [2015] NSWLEC 1260 Hearing Date(s): Conciliation conference 5 May 2015 Date of Orders: 13 July 2015 Decision Date: 13 July 2015 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Tuor C Decision: See (4) below Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION:; conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Decon Australia Pty Limited (Applicant) The Hills Shire Council (Respondent) Representation: Solicitors: Mr P Jackson of Pikes & Verekers Lawyers (Applicant) Mr A Hudson of Wilshire Webb Staunton Beattie (Respondent) File Number(s): 10062 of 2015 JUDGMENTCOMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.In making the...
showFlash = false, 6000)"
>