{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Dasreef Pty Ltd v Hawchar
Download as PDF
Download as Word
Highlights
My Notes
Collections
Create a New Collection
Overview
Full Text
{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Details
Case
Agency Issuance Number
Published Date
Dasreef Pty Ltd v Hawchar
[2011] HCA 21
Tags
No tags available
Case
Dasreef Pty Ltd v Hawchar
[2011] HCA 21
•
HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIAFRENCH CJ,GUMMOW, HAYNE, HEYDON, CRENNAN, KIEFEL AND BELL JJDASREEF PTY LIMITED APPELLANTANDNAWAF HAWCHAR RESPONDENTDasreef Pty Limited v Hawchar [2011] HCA 2122 June 2011S313/2010ORDERAppeal dismissed with costs.On appeal from the Supreme Court of New South WalesRepresentation D F Jackson QC with T G R Parker SC and D T Miller for the appellant (instructed by Moray & Agnew Solicitors)B M Toomey QC with F Tuscano and M A Kumar for the respondent (instructed by Slater & Gordon Lawyers) Notice: This copy of the Court's Reasons for Judgment is subject to formal revision prior to publication in the Commonwealth Law Reports.CATCHWORDSDasreef Pty Limited v HawcharEvidence – Admissibility – Opinion evidence – Section 79(1) of Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) provided that rule excluding evidence of opinion did not apply where "a person has specialised knowledge based on the person's training, study or experience" and person's opinion "wholly or substantially based on that knowledge" – Respondent sued appellant in Dust Diseases Tribunal of New South Wales – Respondent claimed he was negligently exposed to unsafe levels of silica while working for appellant – Witness gave evidence about approximate level of respirable silica to which respondent may have been exposed – Opinion treated as admissible to found calculation of numerical or quantitative level of exposure to respirable silica – Whether opinion admissible for that purpose – Requirements for admissibility.Procedure – Specialist tribunal – Dust Diseases Tribunal of New South Wales – Ability of judge constituting Tribunal to draw on experience as member...
Continue reading the full case
Tags
No tags available
Case
Dasreef Pty Ltd v Hawchar
[2011] HCA 21
•
HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIAFRENCH CJ,GUMMOW, HAYNE, HEYDON, CRENNAN, KIEFEL AND BELL JJDASREEF PTY LIMITED APPELLANTANDNAWAF HAWCHAR RESPONDENTDasreef Pty Limited v Hawchar [2011] HCA 2122 June 2011S313/2010ORDERAppeal dismissed with costs.On appeal from the Supreme Court of New South WalesRepresentation D F Jackson QC with T G R Parker SC and D T Miller for the appellant (instructed by Moray & Agnew Solicitors)B M Toomey QC with F Tuscano and M A Kumar for the respondent (instructed by Slater & Gordon Lawyers) Notice: This copy of the Court's Reasons for Judgment is subject to formal revision prior to publication in the Commonwealth Law Reports.CATCHWORDSDasreef Pty Limited v HawcharEvidence – Admissibility – Opinion evidence – Section 79(1) of Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) provided that rule excluding evidence of opinion did not apply where "a person has specialised knowledge based on the person's training, study or experience" and person's opinion "wholly or substantially based on that knowledge" – Respondent sued appellant in Dust Diseases Tribunal of New South Wales – Respondent claimed he was negligently exposed to unsafe levels of silica while working for appellant – Witness gave evidence about approximate level of respirable silica to which respondent may have been exposed – Opinion treated as admissible to found calculation of numerical or quantitative level of exposure to respirable silica – Whether opinion admissible for that purpose – Requirements for admissibility.Procedure – Specialist tribunal – Dust Diseases Tribunal of New South Wales – Ability of judge constituting Tribunal to draw on experience as member...
showFlash = false, 6000)"
>