{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Cumerlong Holdings Pty Ltd v Dalcross Properties Pty Ltd
Download as PDF
Download as Word
Highlights
My Notes
Collections
Create a New Collection
Overview
Full Text
{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Details
Case
Agency Issuance Number
Published Date
Cumerlong Holdings Pty Ltd v Dalcross Properties Pty Ltd
[2011] HCA 27
Tags
No tags available
Case
Cumerlong Holdings Pty Ltd v Dalcross Properties Pty Ltd
[2011] HCA 27
•
HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIAGUMMOW ACJ,HAYNE, HEYDON, CRENNAN AND BELL JJCUMERLONG HOLDINGS PTY LTD APPELLANTANDDALCROSS PROPERTIES PTY LTD & ORS RESPONDENTSCumerlong Holdings Pty Ltd v Dalcross Properties Pty Ltd [2011] HCA 273 August 2011S120/2011ORDER1.Appeal allowed.2.Set aside the orders of the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of New South Wales made 2 September 2010, and in place thereof order that: (a)the appeal be allowed;(b)the first and second respondents pay the appellant's costs of the appeal to the Court of Appeal up to and including 11 July 2010 and the third respondent pay the appellant's costs thereafter;(c)set aside order 3 of the orders of Smart AJ of the Supreme Court made 30 October 2009, and in place thereof:(i)declare that the change expressed by LEP 194 to the zoning of the land of the appellant, identified as Lot 1 in DP302605, does not have effect to suspend the operation of the restrictive covenant burdening the land of the third respondent, identified as Lot 103 in DP834629; and(ii)order that the third respondent be restrained, by itself, its servants and agents, from using or permitting the use of Lot 103 in DP834629 for any hospital, or any ancillary or associated purpose, contrary to the restriction imposed by instrument registered on 10 November 1993 pursuant to s 88B of the Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW);(d)amend order 4 of the orders of Smart AJ made 30 October 2009 by deleting "Plaintiff pay the defendants' costs of these proceedings" and substituting "First and second defendants pay the plaintiff's...
Continue reading the full case
Tags
No tags available
Case
Cumerlong Holdings Pty Ltd v Dalcross Properties Pty Ltd
[2011] HCA 27
•
HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIAGUMMOW ACJ,HAYNE, HEYDON, CRENNAN AND BELL JJCUMERLONG HOLDINGS PTY LTD APPELLANTANDDALCROSS PROPERTIES PTY LTD & ORS RESPONDENTSCumerlong Holdings Pty Ltd v Dalcross Properties Pty Ltd [2011] HCA 273 August 2011S120/2011ORDER1.Appeal allowed.2.Set aside the orders of the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of New South Wales made 2 September 2010, and in place thereof order that: (a)the appeal be allowed;(b)the first and second respondents pay the appellant's costs of the appeal to the Court of Appeal up to and including 11 July 2010 and the third respondent pay the appellant's costs thereafter;(c)set aside order 3 of the orders of Smart AJ of the Supreme Court made 30 October 2009, and in place thereof:(i)declare that the change expressed by LEP 194 to the zoning of the land of the appellant, identified as Lot 1 in DP302605, does not have effect to suspend the operation of the restrictive covenant burdening the land of the third respondent, identified as Lot 103 in DP834629; and(ii)order that the third respondent be restrained, by itself, its servants and agents, from using or permitting the use of Lot 103 in DP834629 for any hospital, or any ancillary or associated purpose, contrary to the restriction imposed by instrument registered on 10 November 1993 pursuant to s 88B of the Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW);(d)amend order 4 of the orders of Smart AJ made 30 October 2009 by deleting "Plaintiff pay the defendants' costs of these proceedings" and substituting "First and second defendants pay the plaintiff's...
showFlash = false, 6000)"
>