{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
CTM v The Queen
Download as PDF
Download as Word
Highlights
My Notes
Collections
Create a New Collection
Overview
Full Text
{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Details
Case
Agency Issuance Number
Published Date
CTM v The Queen
[2008] HCA 25
Tags
No tags available
Case
CTM v The Queen
[2008] HCA 25
•
HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIAGLEESON CJ,GUMMOW, KIRBY, HAYNE, HEYDON, CRENNAN AND KIEFEL JJCTM APPELLANTANDTHE QUEEN RESPONDENTCTM v The Queen [2008] HCA 2511 June 2008S591/2007ORDERAppeal dismissed.On appeal from the Supreme Court of New South WalesRepresentationT A Game SC and A C Haesler SC with J S Manuell for the appellant (instructed by Legal Aid Commission of NSW)D C Frearson SC with J A Girdham for the respondent (instructed by Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (NSW))Notice: This copy of the Court's Reasons for Judgment is subject to formal revision prior to publication in the Commonwealth Law Reports.CATCHWORDSCTM v The QueenCriminal law – Sexual intercourse with child aged between 14 and 16 years –Whether common law ground of exculpation of honest and reasonable mistake of fact applies to offence under s 66C(3) of the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) – Whether accused entitled to place reliance on honest and reasonable mistake of fact where conduct the subject of charge is denied.Criminal law – Onus and standard of proof – Whether accused obliged to establish honest and reasonable mistake of fact – Whether accused obliged to "enliven" issue of honest and reasonable mistake of fact – Whether accused obliged to adduce evidence in support of contention of honest and reasonable mistake of fact – Whether there was sufficient evidential foundation for contention of honest and reasonable mistake of fact – Whether issue of honest and reasonable mistake of fact sufficiently raised at trial – Whether trial judge obliged to direct jury on issue of honest and reasonable...
Continue reading the full case
Tags
No tags available
Case
CTM v The Queen
[2008] HCA 25
•
HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIAGLEESON CJ,GUMMOW, KIRBY, HAYNE, HEYDON, CRENNAN AND KIEFEL JJCTM APPELLANTANDTHE QUEEN RESPONDENTCTM v The Queen [2008] HCA 2511 June 2008S591/2007ORDERAppeal dismissed.On appeal from the Supreme Court of New South WalesRepresentationT A Game SC and A C Haesler SC with J S Manuell for the appellant (instructed by Legal Aid Commission of NSW)D C Frearson SC with J A Girdham for the respondent (instructed by Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (NSW))Notice: This copy of the Court's Reasons for Judgment is subject to formal revision prior to publication in the Commonwealth Law Reports.CATCHWORDSCTM v The QueenCriminal law – Sexual intercourse with child aged between 14 and 16 years –Whether common law ground of exculpation of honest and reasonable mistake of fact applies to offence under s 66C(3) of the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) – Whether accused entitled to place reliance on honest and reasonable mistake of fact where conduct the subject of charge is denied.Criminal law – Onus and standard of proof – Whether accused obliged to establish honest and reasonable mistake of fact – Whether accused obliged to "enliven" issue of honest and reasonable mistake of fact – Whether accused obliged to adduce evidence in support of contention of honest and reasonable mistake of fact – Whether there was sufficient evidential foundation for contention of honest and reasonable mistake of fact – Whether issue of honest and reasonable mistake of fact sufficiently raised at trial – Whether trial judge obliged to direct jury on issue of honest and reasonable...
showFlash = false, 6000)"
>