{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
CSR Ltd v Della Maddalena
Download as PDF
Download as Word
Highlights
My Notes
Collections
Create a New Collection
Overview
Full Text
{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Details
Case
Agency Issuance Number
Published Date
CSR Ltd v Della Maddalena
[2006] HCA 1
Tags
No tags available
Case
CSR Ltd v Della Maddalena
[2006] HCA 1
•
HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIAGLEESON CJ,KIRBY, HAYNE, CALLINAN AND HEYDON JJCSR LTD & ANOR APPELLANTSANDARTURO DELLA MADDALENA RESPONDENTCSR Ltd v Della Maddalena [2006] HCA 12 February 2006P36/2005ORDER1. Appeal allowed.2.Set aside paragraphs 2 and 3 of the orders of the Full Court of the Supreme Court of Western Australia made on 13 October 2004 and, in their place, order that:(a)the judgment and orders of the District Court of Western Australia made on 17 December 2002 be set aside; and(b)there be a new trial of the action.On appeal from the Supreme Court of Western AustraliaRepresentation:B W Walker QC with J G Mengler for the appellants (instructed by Jackson McDonald)B F Quinn with P D Nicholas for the respondent (instructed by Slater & Gordon)Notice: This copy of the Court's Reasons for Judgment is subject to formal revision prior to publication in the Commonwealth Law Reports.CATCHWORDSCSR Ltd v Della MaddalenaPractice and procedure – Appeal – Credibility of witness – Whether intermediate appellate court entitled to substitute its own findings as to credibility for that of trial judge – Whether court erred in ordering retrial limited to assessment of damages. Courts – Appeal – Procedural fairness – Expert witnesses – Court expressed preference for evidence of particular expert witnesses – Whether court's reference to such expert witnesses as "well known to the court" constituted a breach of procedural fairness – Whether matter should be remitted for rehearing.Words and phrases – "procedural fairness", "retrial".Supreme Court Act 1935 (WA), s 58(1)(a).GLEESON CJ. I agree with the orders proposed...
Continue reading the full case
Tags
No tags available
Case
CSR Ltd v Della Maddalena
[2006] HCA 1
•
HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIAGLEESON CJ,KIRBY, HAYNE, CALLINAN AND HEYDON JJCSR LTD & ANOR APPELLANTSANDARTURO DELLA MADDALENA RESPONDENTCSR Ltd v Della Maddalena [2006] HCA 12 February 2006P36/2005ORDER1. Appeal allowed.2.Set aside paragraphs 2 and 3 of the orders of the Full Court of the Supreme Court of Western Australia made on 13 October 2004 and, in their place, order that:(a)the judgment and orders of the District Court of Western Australia made on 17 December 2002 be set aside; and(b)there be a new trial of the action.On appeal from the Supreme Court of Western AustraliaRepresentation:B W Walker QC with J G Mengler for the appellants (instructed by Jackson McDonald)B F Quinn with P D Nicholas for the respondent (instructed by Slater & Gordon)Notice: This copy of the Court's Reasons for Judgment is subject to formal revision prior to publication in the Commonwealth Law Reports.CATCHWORDSCSR Ltd v Della MaddalenaPractice and procedure – Appeal – Credibility of witness – Whether intermediate appellate court entitled to substitute its own findings as to credibility for that of trial judge – Whether court erred in ordering retrial limited to assessment of damages. Courts – Appeal – Procedural fairness – Expert witnesses – Court expressed preference for evidence of particular expert witnesses – Whether court's reference to such expert witnesses as "well known to the court" constituted a breach of procedural fairness – Whether matter should be remitted for rehearing.Words and phrases – "procedural fairness", "retrial".Supreme Court Act 1935 (WA), s 58(1)(a).GLEESON CJ. I agree with the orders proposed...
showFlash = false, 6000)"
>