{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
CPT Custodian Pty Ltd v Commissioner of State Revenue
Download as PDF
Download as Word
Highlights
My Notes
Collections
Create a New Collection
Overview
Full Text
{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Details
Case
Agency Issuance Number
Published Date
CPT Custodian Pty Ltd v Commissioner of State Revenue
[2005] HCA 53
Tags
No tags available
Case
CPT Custodian Pty Ltd v Commissioner of State Revenue
[2005] HCA 53
•
HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIAGLEESON CJ,McHUGH, GUMMOW, CALLINAN AND HEYDON JJMatter No M222/2004 & M223/2004CPT CUSTODIAN PTY LTD (previously trading under the name SANDHURST NOMINEES (VIC) LIMITED) APPELLANTANDCOMMISSIONER OF STATE REVENUE RESPONDENTMatter No M215/2004, M216/2004, M217/2004 & M218/2004COMMISSIONER OF STATE REVENUE APPELLANTANDKARINGAL 2 HOLDINGS PTY LTD RESPONDENTCPT Custodian Pty Ltd v Commissioner of State Revenue Commissioner of State Revenue v Karingal 2 Holdings Pty Ltd[2005] HCA 5328 September 2005M222/2004 & M223/2004andM215/2004 to M218/2004ORDERMatter No M222/2004:1. Appeal allowed with costs.2.Set aside the orders of the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of Victoria made on 16 December 2003 and, in their place, order that:(i) the appeal to that Court is dismissed with costs;(ii)the cross-appeal to that Court is allowed with costs;(iii)the orders of Nettle J made on 29 October 2002 are varied so that the appeal to the Supreme Court of Victoria in respect of amended assessment S 020601711-2 is allowed with costs, the amended assessment is set aside, and the subject-matter thereof is remitted to the Commissioner for reconsideration and determination in accordance with law.Matter No M223/2004:1. Appeal allowed with costs.2.Set aside the orders of the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of Victoria made on 16 December 2003 and, in their place, order that:(i) the appeal to that Court is dismissed with costs;(ii)the cross-appeal to that Court is allowed with costs;(iii)the orders of Nettle J made on 29 October 2002 are varied so that the appeal to the Supreme Court of Victoria in respect of amended assessment S ...
Continue reading the full case
Tags
No tags available
Case
CPT Custodian Pty Ltd v Commissioner of State Revenue
[2005] HCA 53
•
HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIAGLEESON CJ,McHUGH, GUMMOW, CALLINAN AND HEYDON JJMatter No M222/2004 & M223/2004CPT CUSTODIAN PTY LTD (previously trading under the name SANDHURST NOMINEES (VIC) LIMITED) APPELLANTANDCOMMISSIONER OF STATE REVENUE RESPONDENTMatter No M215/2004, M216/2004, M217/2004 & M218/2004COMMISSIONER OF STATE REVENUE APPELLANTANDKARINGAL 2 HOLDINGS PTY LTD RESPONDENTCPT Custodian Pty Ltd v Commissioner of State Revenue Commissioner of State Revenue v Karingal 2 Holdings Pty Ltd[2005] HCA 5328 September 2005M222/2004 & M223/2004andM215/2004 to M218/2004ORDERMatter No M222/2004:1. Appeal allowed with costs.2.Set aside the orders of the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of Victoria made on 16 December 2003 and, in their place, order that:(i) the appeal to that Court is dismissed with costs;(ii)the cross-appeal to that Court is allowed with costs;(iii)the orders of Nettle J made on 29 October 2002 are varied so that the appeal to the Supreme Court of Victoria in respect of amended assessment S 020601711-2 is allowed with costs, the amended assessment is set aside, and the subject-matter thereof is remitted to the Commissioner for reconsideration and determination in accordance with law.Matter No M223/2004:1. Appeal allowed with costs.2.Set aside the orders of the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of Victoria made on 16 December 2003 and, in their place, order that:(i) the appeal to that Court is dismissed with costs;(ii)the cross-appeal to that Court is allowed with costs;(iii)the orders of Nettle J made on 29 October 2002 are varied so that the appeal to the Supreme Court of Victoria in respect of amended assessment S ...
showFlash = false, 6000)"
>