{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Complex Field Pty Limited v Ballina Shire Council
Download as PDF
Download as Word
Highlights
My Notes
Collections
Create a New Collection
Overview
Full Text
{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Details
Case
Agency Issuance Number
Published Date
Complex Field Pty Limited v Ballina Shire Council
[2016] NSWLEC 1239
Tags
No tags available
Case
Complex Field Pty Limited v Ballina Shire Council
[2016] NSWLEC 1239
•
Land and Environment Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Complex Field Pty Limited v Ballina Shire Council [2016] NSWLEC 1239 Hearing dates:8 June 2016Date of orders: 14 June 2016 Decision date: 14 June 2016 Jurisdiction:Class 1Before: Morris C Decision: Appeal upheld Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: subdivision, whether conditions requiring restriction as to user should be imposed Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979; Ballina Local Environmental Plan 2012; State Environmental Planning Policy No. 71 – Coastal Protection; Coastal Protection Act, 1979; Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979; State Environmental Planning Policy (Exempt and Complying Development 2008) Cases Cited: MacDonald v Mosman Council [1999] NSWLEC 215 Texts Cited: Ballina Development Control Plan 2012; Building Code of Australia Category:Principal judgmentParties: Complex Field Pty Limited (Applicant) Ballina Shire Council (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr T Hale SC (Applicant) Mr M Seymour (Respondent) Solicitors: Bilbie Dan (Applicant) C H Law (Respondent) File Number(s):2016/159728 (Formerly 2015/11063)Judgment Complex Field Pty Ltd lodged Development Application DA 2015/377 with Ballina Shire Council on 28 July 2015 seeking consent to subdivide two adjoining allotments to create four lots. The Council refused consent and Complex Field is appealing that decision. The matter commenced as a conciliation conference with agreement in principle reached to the subdivision however no agreement was reached regarding consent conditions. The conciliation conference was terminated and the matter is now the subject of a hearing pursuant to the provisions of Section 34(4)(b) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979. The particular condition in dispute, condition 16,...
Continue reading the full case
Tags
No tags available
Case
Complex Field Pty Limited v Ballina Shire Council
[2016] NSWLEC 1239
•
Land and Environment Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Complex Field Pty Limited v Ballina Shire Council [2016] NSWLEC 1239 Hearing dates:8 June 2016Date of orders: 14 June 2016 Decision date: 14 June 2016 Jurisdiction:Class 1Before: Morris C Decision: Appeal upheld Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: subdivision, whether conditions requiring restriction as to user should be imposed Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979; Ballina Local Environmental Plan 2012; State Environmental Planning Policy No. 71 – Coastal Protection; Coastal Protection Act, 1979; Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979; State Environmental Planning Policy (Exempt and Complying Development 2008) Cases Cited: MacDonald v Mosman Council [1999] NSWLEC 215 Texts Cited: Ballina Development Control Plan 2012; Building Code of Australia Category:Principal judgmentParties: Complex Field Pty Limited (Applicant) Ballina Shire Council (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr T Hale SC (Applicant) Mr M Seymour (Respondent) Solicitors: Bilbie Dan (Applicant) C H Law (Respondent) File Number(s):2016/159728 (Formerly 2015/11063)Judgment Complex Field Pty Ltd lodged Development Application DA 2015/377 with Ballina Shire Council on 28 July 2015 seeking consent to subdivide two adjoining allotments to create four lots. The Council refused consent and Complex Field is appealing that decision. The matter commenced as a conciliation conference with agreement in principle reached to the subdivision however no agreement was reached regarding consent conditions. The conciliation conference was terminated and the matter is now the subject of a hearing pursuant to the provisions of Section 34(4)(b) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979. The particular condition in dispute, condition 16,...
showFlash = false, 6000)"
>