{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Commissioner of Main Roads v Jones
Download as PDF
Download as Word
Highlights
My Notes
Collections
Create a New Collection
Overview
Full Text
{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Details
Case
Agency Issuance Number
Published Date
Commissioner of Main Roads v Jones
[2005] HCA 27
Tags
No tags available
Case
Commissioner of Main Roads v Jones
[2005] HCA 27
•
HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIAGLEESON CJ,McHUGH, GUMMOW, HAYNE AND CALLINAN JJCOMMISSIONER OF MAIN ROADS APPELLANTANDLLOYD RUSSELL JONES RESPONDENTCommissioner of Main Roads v Jones [2005] HCA 2720 May 2005Amended Order made 25 May 2005P31/2004AMENDED ORDER1.Appeal allowed.2.Appellant to pay the costs of the respondent of the appeal.3.Set aside orders 1 to 4 of the Full Court of the Supreme Court of Western Australia made on 20 November 2002 and in their place order that the appeal to that Court be dismissed.On appeal from the Supreme Court of Western AustraliaRepresentation:B W Walker SC with G R Hancy for the appellant (instructed by Corser and Corser)D F Jackson QC with K J Bradford for the respondent (instructed by Bradford & Co)Notice: This copy of the Court's Reasons for Judgment is subject to formal revision prior to publication in the Commonwealth Law Reports.CATCHWORDSCommissioner of Main Roads v JonesNegligence – Standard of care – Breach – Respondent driver injured after car collided with wild horse on highway – Appellant a body corporate upon which care, control and management of highways was conferred – Whether appellant should have been aware of attraction of animals to water sources near accident site and exercised power to reduce speed limit and to erect warning sign.Courts – Appeals – Whether Full Court of the Supreme Court of Western Australia justified in overturning findings of trial judge on danger posed by animals straying on highway.Negligence – Causation – Whether, if speed limit reduced or warning sign erected, respondent's injuries would have been prevented.Practice...
Continue reading the full case
Tags
No tags available
Case
Commissioner of Main Roads v Jones
[2005] HCA 27
•
HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIAGLEESON CJ,McHUGH, GUMMOW, HAYNE AND CALLINAN JJCOMMISSIONER OF MAIN ROADS APPELLANTANDLLOYD RUSSELL JONES RESPONDENTCommissioner of Main Roads v Jones [2005] HCA 2720 May 2005Amended Order made 25 May 2005P31/2004AMENDED ORDER1.Appeal allowed.2.Appellant to pay the costs of the respondent of the appeal.3.Set aside orders 1 to 4 of the Full Court of the Supreme Court of Western Australia made on 20 November 2002 and in their place order that the appeal to that Court be dismissed.On appeal from the Supreme Court of Western AustraliaRepresentation:B W Walker SC with G R Hancy for the appellant (instructed by Corser and Corser)D F Jackson QC with K J Bradford for the respondent (instructed by Bradford & Co)Notice: This copy of the Court's Reasons for Judgment is subject to formal revision prior to publication in the Commonwealth Law Reports.CATCHWORDSCommissioner of Main Roads v JonesNegligence – Standard of care – Breach – Respondent driver injured after car collided with wild horse on highway – Appellant a body corporate upon which care, control and management of highways was conferred – Whether appellant should have been aware of attraction of animals to water sources near accident site and exercised power to reduce speed limit and to erect warning sign.Courts – Appeals – Whether Full Court of the Supreme Court of Western Australia justified in overturning findings of trial judge on danger posed by animals straying on highway.Negligence – Causation – Whether, if speed limit reduced or warning sign erected, respondent's injuries would have been prevented.Practice...
showFlash = false, 6000)"
>