{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Chesters v Oakes
Download as PDF
Download as Word
Highlights
My Notes
Collections
Create a New Collection
Overview
Full Text
{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Details
Case
Agency Issuance Number
Published Date
Chesters v Oakes
[2016] NSWLEC 1504
Tags
No tags available
Case
Chesters v Oakes
[2016] NSWLEC 1504
•
Land and Environment Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Chesters v Oakes [2016] NSWLEC 1504 Hearing dates:25 October 2016Date of orders: 25 October 2016 Decision date: 25 October 2016 Jurisdiction:Class 2Before: Galwey AC Decision: The application is upheld. See orders at paragraph 14. Catchwords: TREES (DISPUTES BETWEEN NEIGHBOURS); damage; debris; orders for pruning. Legislation Cited: Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 Category:Principal judgmentParties: Michael Chesters (Applicant) Michael Oakes (Respondent) Representation: Michael Chesters, litigant in person (Applicant) Michael Oakes, litigant in person (Respondent) File Number(s):197205 of 2016JudgmentBackground Mr Chesters (‘the applicant’) owns a residential property in Cardiff. Part of the dwelling on the property is not completed nor approved for inhabiting. A small flat at the rear of the dwelling is habitable. Two native trees on the neighbouring property, owned by Mr Oakes (‘the respondent’), stand roughly in line with the rear of Mr Chesters’ dwelling, 6—7.5 metres from the common boundary. Approximately three years ago a branch fell from the tree nearest Mr Chesters’ dwelling (Tree 1). Mr Chesters says it damaged some roof guttering and two roofing panels, causing damage that cost $200 to repair. Mr Oakes acknowledges that a branch fell but disputes that it hit or damaged Mr Chesters’ dwelling. Mr Chesters is concerned that more branches may fall onto his property, or that one or both trees may fall onto his property. He says debris on his roof is from these trees. He says water pools in Mr Oakes’ property, increasing the risk of trees...
Continue reading the full case
Tags
No tags available
Case
Chesters v Oakes
[2016] NSWLEC 1504
•
Land and Environment Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Chesters v Oakes [2016] NSWLEC 1504 Hearing dates:25 October 2016Date of orders: 25 October 2016 Decision date: 25 October 2016 Jurisdiction:Class 2Before: Galwey AC Decision: The application is upheld. See orders at paragraph 14. Catchwords: TREES (DISPUTES BETWEEN NEIGHBOURS); damage; debris; orders for pruning. Legislation Cited: Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 Category:Principal judgmentParties: Michael Chesters (Applicant) Michael Oakes (Respondent) Representation: Michael Chesters, litigant in person (Applicant) Michael Oakes, litigant in person (Respondent) File Number(s):197205 of 2016JudgmentBackground Mr Chesters (‘the applicant’) owns a residential property in Cardiff. Part of the dwelling on the property is not completed nor approved for inhabiting. A small flat at the rear of the dwelling is habitable. Two native trees on the neighbouring property, owned by Mr Oakes (‘the respondent’), stand roughly in line with the rear of Mr Chesters’ dwelling, 6—7.5 metres from the common boundary. Approximately three years ago a branch fell from the tree nearest Mr Chesters’ dwelling (Tree 1). Mr Chesters says it damaged some roof guttering and two roofing panels, causing damage that cost $200 to repair. Mr Oakes acknowledges that a branch fell but disputes that it hit or damaged Mr Chesters’ dwelling. Mr Chesters is concerned that more branches may fall onto his property, or that one or both trees may fall onto his property. He says debris on his roof is from these trees. He says water pools in Mr Oakes’ property, increasing the risk of trees...
showFlash = false, 6000)"
>