{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Charalambous v Waverley Council
Download as PDF
Download as Word
Highlights
My Notes
Collections
Create a New Collection
Overview
Full Text
{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Details
Case
Agency Issuance Number
Published Date
Charalambous v Waverley Council
[2016] NSWLEC 1387
Tags
No tags available
Case
Charalambous v Waverley Council
[2016] NSWLEC 1387
•
Land and Environment Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Charalambous v Waverley Council [2016] NSWLEC 1387 Hearing dates:Conciliation conference on 2 August 2016Date of orders: 02 September 2016 Decision date: 02 September 2016 Jurisdiction:Class 1Before: Dickson C Decision: See [5] below Catchwords: Appeal under s97(3) against deferred commencement development consent - conciliation conference - agreement between the parties - orders Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Category:Principal judgmentParties: Costa Charalambous (Applicant) Waverley Council (Respondent) Representation: Solicitors: Mr. Conomos, Conomos Legal (Applicant) Mr. Paterson, Wilshire Webb Staunton Beattie Lawyers (Respondent) File Number(s):2016/00161845Publication restriction:No Judgment COMMISSIONER: This is an appeal, under s97 (3) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, against a deferred commencement consent for alterations and additions to an existing residential flat building at 10 Moore St Bondi [DA 470/2015]. In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”. The Court Act also required me to...
Continue reading the full case
Tags
No tags available
Case
Charalambous v Waverley Council
[2016] NSWLEC 1387
•
Land and Environment Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Charalambous v Waverley Council [2016] NSWLEC 1387 Hearing dates:Conciliation conference on 2 August 2016Date of orders: 02 September 2016 Decision date: 02 September 2016 Jurisdiction:Class 1Before: Dickson C Decision: See [5] below Catchwords: Appeal under s97(3) against deferred commencement development consent - conciliation conference - agreement between the parties - orders Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Category:Principal judgmentParties: Costa Charalambous (Applicant) Waverley Council (Respondent) Representation: Solicitors: Mr. Conomos, Conomos Legal (Applicant) Mr. Paterson, Wilshire Webb Staunton Beattie Lawyers (Respondent) File Number(s):2016/00161845Publication restriction:No Judgment COMMISSIONER: This is an appeal, under s97 (3) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, against a deferred commencement consent for alterations and additions to an existing residential flat building at 10 Moore St Bondi [DA 470/2015]. In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”. The Court Act also required me to...
showFlash = false, 6000)"
>