{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
CBI Constructors Pty Ltd v Chevron Australia Pty Ltd
Download as PDF
Download as Word
Highlights
My Notes
Collections
Create a New Collection
Overview
Full Text
{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Details
Case
Agency Issuance Number
Published Date
CBI Constructors Pty Ltd v Chevron Australia Pty Ltd
[2024] HCA 28
Tags
No tags available
Case
CBI Constructors Pty Ltd v Chevron Australia Pty Ltd
[2024] HCA 28
•
HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIAGAGELER CJ,GORDON, EDELMAN, STEWARD, GLEESON, JAGOT AND BEECH‑JONES JJCBI CONSTRUCTORS PTY LTD & ANOR APPELLANTSANDCHEVRON AUSTRALIA PTY LTD RESPONDENTCBI Constructors Pty Ltd v Chevron Australia Pty Ltd[2024] HCA 28Date of Hearing: 16 April 2024Date of Judgment: 14 August 2024P22/2023ORDERAppeal dismissed with costs.On appeal from the Supreme Court of Western AustraliaRepresentationJ C Sheahan KC with B Yin for the appellants (instructed by Clayton Utz)S L Doyle KC with S J Davis and D C McKimmie for the respondent (instructed by Norton Rose Fulbright)Notice: This copy of the Court's Reasons for Judgment is subject to formal revision prior to publication in the Commonwealth Law Reports.CATCHWORDSCBI Constructors Pty Ltd v Chevron Australia Pty LtdArbitration – Award – Application to set aside arbitral award – Where arbitration proceedings arose from dispute concerning contract to provide staff – Where tribunal issued first interim award on issues of liability – Where appellants repleaded their case on quantum ("Contract Criteria Case") – Where respondent objected to Contract Criteria Case on basis of res judicata, issue estoppel, Anshun estoppel and that tribunal was functus officio – Where tribunal rejected respondent's objections and issued second interim award – Where respondent applied to set aside second interim award under s 34(2)(a)(iii) of Commercial Arbitration Act 2012 (WA) – Where primary judge set aside second interim award and held tribunal was functus officio – Where Court of Appeal of Supreme Court of Western Australia dismissed appeal – Whether Court of Appeal erred in holding Supreme Court had power...
Continue reading the full case
Tags
No tags available
Case
CBI Constructors Pty Ltd v Chevron Australia Pty Ltd
[2024] HCA 28
•
HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIAGAGELER CJ,GORDON, EDELMAN, STEWARD, GLEESON, JAGOT AND BEECH‑JONES JJCBI CONSTRUCTORS PTY LTD & ANOR APPELLANTSANDCHEVRON AUSTRALIA PTY LTD RESPONDENTCBI Constructors Pty Ltd v Chevron Australia Pty Ltd[2024] HCA 28Date of Hearing: 16 April 2024Date of Judgment: 14 August 2024P22/2023ORDERAppeal dismissed with costs.On appeal from the Supreme Court of Western AustraliaRepresentationJ C Sheahan KC with B Yin for the appellants (instructed by Clayton Utz)S L Doyle KC with S J Davis and D C McKimmie for the respondent (instructed by Norton Rose Fulbright)Notice: This copy of the Court's Reasons for Judgment is subject to formal revision prior to publication in the Commonwealth Law Reports.CATCHWORDSCBI Constructors Pty Ltd v Chevron Australia Pty LtdArbitration – Award – Application to set aside arbitral award – Where arbitration proceedings arose from dispute concerning contract to provide staff – Where tribunal issued first interim award on issues of liability – Where appellants repleaded their case on quantum ("Contract Criteria Case") – Where respondent objected to Contract Criteria Case on basis of res judicata, issue estoppel, Anshun estoppel and that tribunal was functus officio – Where tribunal rejected respondent's objections and issued second interim award – Where respondent applied to set aside second interim award under s 34(2)(a)(iii) of Commercial Arbitration Act 2012 (WA) – Where primary judge set aside second interim award and held tribunal was functus officio – Where Court of Appeal of Supreme Court of Western Australia dismissed appeal – Whether Court of Appeal erred in holding Supreme Court had power...
showFlash = false, 6000)"
>