{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
BVD17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection
Download as PDF
Download as Word
Highlights
My Notes
Collections
Create a New Collection
Overview
Full Text
{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Details
Case
Agency Issuance Number
Published Date
BVD17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection
[2019] HCA 34
Tags
No tags available
Case
BVD17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection
[2019] HCA 34
•
HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIAKIEFEL CJ,BELL, GAGELER, KEANE, NETTLE, GORDON AND EDELMAN JJBVD17 APPELLANTANDMINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND BORDER PROTECTION & ANOR RESPONDENTSBVD17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection[2019] HCA 349 October 2019S46/2019ORDERAppeal dismissed with costs. On appeal from the Federal Court of AustraliaRepresentationA Aleksov for the appellant (instructed by Australian Presence Legal)G T Johnson SC with N D J Swan for the first respondent (instructed by MinterEllison)Submitting appearance for the second respondentNotice: This copy of the Court's Reasons for Judgment is subject to formal revision prior to publication in the Commonwealth Law Reports.CATCHWORDSBVD17 v Minister for Immigration and Border ProtectionImmigration – Refugees – Application for protection visa – Immigration Assessment Authority ("Authority") – Review by Authority under Pt 7AA of Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – Where decision by delegate of Minister for Immigration and Border Protection to refuse protection visa referred to Authority for review – Where Secretary of Department of Immigration and Border Protection gave Authority documents and information – Where Secretary notified Authority that s 473GB applied to documents and information – Where s 473GB(3) conferred discretions on Authority, upon notification, to have regard to matter in document or to information and to disclose matter in document or information to referred applicant – Where documents and information not disclosed to referred applicant during review – Where fact of notification not disclosed to referred applicant during review – Whether procedural fairness required Authority to disclose fact of notification to referred applicant.Administrative law – Judicial review – Jurisdictional error –...
Continue reading the full case
Tags
No tags available
Case
BVD17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection
[2019] HCA 34
•
HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIAKIEFEL CJ,BELL, GAGELER, KEANE, NETTLE, GORDON AND EDELMAN JJBVD17 APPELLANTANDMINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND BORDER PROTECTION & ANOR RESPONDENTSBVD17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection[2019] HCA 349 October 2019S46/2019ORDERAppeal dismissed with costs. On appeal from the Federal Court of AustraliaRepresentationA Aleksov for the appellant (instructed by Australian Presence Legal)G T Johnson SC with N D J Swan for the first respondent (instructed by MinterEllison)Submitting appearance for the second respondentNotice: This copy of the Court's Reasons for Judgment is subject to formal revision prior to publication in the Commonwealth Law Reports.CATCHWORDSBVD17 v Minister for Immigration and Border ProtectionImmigration – Refugees – Application for protection visa – Immigration Assessment Authority ("Authority") – Review by Authority under Pt 7AA of Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – Where decision by delegate of Minister for Immigration and Border Protection to refuse protection visa referred to Authority for review – Where Secretary of Department of Immigration and Border Protection gave Authority documents and information – Where Secretary notified Authority that s 473GB applied to documents and information – Where s 473GB(3) conferred discretions on Authority, upon notification, to have regard to matter in document or to information and to disclose matter in document or information to referred applicant – Where documents and information not disclosed to referred applicant during review – Where fact of notification not disclosed to referred applicant during review – Whether procedural fairness required Authority to disclose fact of notification to referred applicant.Administrative law – Judicial review – Jurisdictional error –...
showFlash = false, 6000)"
>