Bugmy v The Queen

PDF
Word
Highlights
Notes
Overview Full Text
Details
Case Agency Issuance Number Published Date

Bugmy v The Queen

[2013] HCA 37

Tags

No tags available

Case

Bugmy v The Queen

[2013] HCA 37

HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIAFRENCH CJ,HAYNE, CRENNAN, KIEFEL, BELL, GAGELER AND KEANE JJWILLIAM DAVID BUGMY  APPELLANTANDTHE QUEEN  RESPONDENTBugmy v The Queen[2013] HCA 372 October 2013S99/2013ORDER1.Appeal allowed. 2.Set aside paragraphs 1, 3 and 4 of the order of the Court of Criminal Appeal of the Supreme Court of New South Wales made on 18 October 2012.3.Remit the matter to the Court of Criminal Appeal.On appeal from the Supreme Court of New South WalesRepresentationD Yehia SC with G A Bashir for the appellant (instructed by Aboriginal Legal Service (NSW/ACT) Ltd)L A Babb SC with K H Alder for the respondent (instructed by Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW))Notice:  This copy of the Court's Reasons for Judgment is subject to formal revision prior to publication in the Commonwealth Law Reports.CATCHWORDSBugmy v The QueenCriminal law – Appeal – Prosecution appeal against sentence – Where sole ground of appeal manifest inadequacy – Where appellate court increased offender's sentence – Whether finding of manifest inadequacy required before discretion to vary sentence enlivened. Criminal law – Sentence – Principles – Relevance of deprived background of Aboriginal offender – Application of Fernando (1992) 76 A Crim R 58 – Whether effect of social deprivation diminishes with time and repeat offending – Whether social deprivation has same mitigatory effect for all purposes of punishment – Whether courts should take into account unique circumstances of Aboriginal offenders and high rate of incarceration of Aboriginal Australians when sentencing Aboriginal offender – Whether approach to sentencing Aboriginal offenders in R v Gladue [1999] 1...

Continue reading the full case

Case content preview

Tags

No tags available

Case

Bugmy v The Queen

[2013] HCA 37

HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIAFRENCH CJ,HAYNE, CRENNAN, KIEFEL, BELL, GAGELER AND KEANE JJWILLIAM DAVID BUGMY  APPELLANTANDTHE QUEEN  RESPONDENTBugmy v The Queen[2013] HCA 372 October 2013S99/2013ORDER1.Appeal allowed. 2.Set aside paragraphs 1, 3 and 4 of the order of the Court of Criminal Appeal of the Supreme Court of New South Wales made on 18 October 2012.3.Remit the matter to the Court of Criminal Appeal.On appeal from the Supreme Court of New South WalesRepresentationD Yehia SC with G A Bashir for the appellant (instructed by Aboriginal Legal Service (NSW/ACT) Ltd)L A Babb SC with K H Alder for the respondent (instructed by Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW))Notice:  This copy of the Court's Reasons for Judgment is subject to formal revision prior to publication in the Commonwealth Law Reports.CATCHWORDSBugmy v The QueenCriminal law – Appeal – Prosecution appeal against sentence – Where sole ground of appeal manifest inadequacy – Where appellate court increased offender's sentence – Whether finding of manifest inadequacy required before discretion to vary sentence enlivened. Criminal law – Sentence – Principles – Relevance of deprived background of Aboriginal offender – Application of Fernando (1992) 76 A Crim R 58 – Whether effect of social deprivation diminishes with time and repeat offending – Whether social deprivation has same mitigatory effect for all purposes of punishment – Whether courts should take into account unique circumstances of Aboriginal offenders and high rate of incarceration of Aboriginal Australians when sentencing Aboriginal offender – Whether approach to sentencing Aboriginal offenders in R v Gladue [1999] 1...