{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Bugmy v The Queen
Download as PDF
Download as Word
Highlights
My Notes
Collections
Create a New Collection
Overview
Full Text
{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Details
Case
Agency Issuance Number
Published Date
Bugmy v The Queen
[2013] HCA 37
Tags
No tags available
Case
Bugmy v The Queen
[2013] HCA 37
•
HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIAFRENCH CJ,HAYNE, CRENNAN, KIEFEL, BELL, GAGELER AND KEANE JJWILLIAM DAVID BUGMY APPELLANTANDTHE QUEEN RESPONDENTBugmy v The Queen[2013] HCA 372 October 2013S99/2013ORDER1.Appeal allowed. 2.Set aside paragraphs 1, 3 and 4 of the order of the Court of Criminal Appeal of the Supreme Court of New South Wales made on 18 October 2012.3.Remit the matter to the Court of Criminal Appeal.On appeal from the Supreme Court of New South WalesRepresentationD Yehia SC with G A Bashir for the appellant (instructed by Aboriginal Legal Service (NSW/ACT) Ltd)L A Babb SC with K H Alder for the respondent (instructed by Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW))Notice: This copy of the Court's Reasons for Judgment is subject to formal revision prior to publication in the Commonwealth Law Reports.CATCHWORDSBugmy v The QueenCriminal law – Appeal – Prosecution appeal against sentence – Where sole ground of appeal manifest inadequacy – Where appellate court increased offender's sentence – Whether finding of manifest inadequacy required before discretion to vary sentence enlivened. Criminal law – Sentence – Principles – Relevance of deprived background of Aboriginal offender – Application of Fernando (1992) 76 A Crim R 58 – Whether effect of social deprivation diminishes with time and repeat offending – Whether social deprivation has same mitigatory effect for all purposes of punishment – Whether courts should take into account unique circumstances of Aboriginal offenders and high rate of incarceration of Aboriginal Australians when sentencing Aboriginal offender – Whether approach to sentencing Aboriginal offenders in R v Gladue [1999] 1...
Continue reading the full case
Tags
No tags available
Case
Bugmy v The Queen
[2013] HCA 37
•
HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIAFRENCH CJ,HAYNE, CRENNAN, KIEFEL, BELL, GAGELER AND KEANE JJWILLIAM DAVID BUGMY APPELLANTANDTHE QUEEN RESPONDENTBugmy v The Queen[2013] HCA 372 October 2013S99/2013ORDER1.Appeal allowed. 2.Set aside paragraphs 1, 3 and 4 of the order of the Court of Criminal Appeal of the Supreme Court of New South Wales made on 18 October 2012.3.Remit the matter to the Court of Criminal Appeal.On appeal from the Supreme Court of New South WalesRepresentationD Yehia SC with G A Bashir for the appellant (instructed by Aboriginal Legal Service (NSW/ACT) Ltd)L A Babb SC with K H Alder for the respondent (instructed by Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW))Notice: This copy of the Court's Reasons for Judgment is subject to formal revision prior to publication in the Commonwealth Law Reports.CATCHWORDSBugmy v The QueenCriminal law – Appeal – Prosecution appeal against sentence – Where sole ground of appeal manifest inadequacy – Where appellate court increased offender's sentence – Whether finding of manifest inadequacy required before discretion to vary sentence enlivened. Criminal law – Sentence – Principles – Relevance of deprived background of Aboriginal offender – Application of Fernando (1992) 76 A Crim R 58 – Whether effect of social deprivation diminishes with time and repeat offending – Whether social deprivation has same mitigatory effect for all purposes of punishment – Whether courts should take into account unique circumstances of Aboriginal offenders and high rate of incarceration of Aboriginal Australians when sentencing Aboriginal offender – Whether approach to sentencing Aboriginal offenders in R v Gladue [1999] 1...
showFlash = false, 6000)"
>