{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Brown v Inner West Council
Download as PDF
Download as Word
Highlights
My Notes
Collections
Create a New Collection
Overview
Full Text
{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Details
Case
Agency Issuance Number
Published Date
Brown v Inner West Council
[2016] NSWLEC 1371
Tags
No tags available
Case
Brown v Inner West Council
[2016] NSWLEC 1371
•
Land and Environment Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Brown v Inner West Council [2016] NSWLEC 1371 Hearing dates:Conciliation conference on 30 August 2016Date of orders: 30 August 2016 Decision date: 30 August 2016 Jurisdiction:Class 1Before: Fakes C Decision: See (4) below Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION; Mixed use development; heritage; bulk and scale; waste management; conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Category:Principal judgmentParties: Kevin Brown (Applicant) Inner West Council (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Applicant: Ms J Reid Respondent: Ms J McKelvey Solicitors: Applicant: Pikes & Verekers Lawyers Respondent: Inner West Council File Number(s):150287 of 2016Publication restriction:NoJudgment COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”. The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document. In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the...
Continue reading the full case
Tags
No tags available
Case
Brown v Inner West Council
[2016] NSWLEC 1371
•
Land and Environment Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Brown v Inner West Council [2016] NSWLEC 1371 Hearing dates:Conciliation conference on 30 August 2016Date of orders: 30 August 2016 Decision date: 30 August 2016 Jurisdiction:Class 1Before: Fakes C Decision: See (4) below Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION; Mixed use development; heritage; bulk and scale; waste management; conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Category:Principal judgmentParties: Kevin Brown (Applicant) Inner West Council (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Applicant: Ms J Reid Respondent: Ms J McKelvey Solicitors: Applicant: Pikes & Verekers Lawyers Respondent: Inner West Council File Number(s):150287 of 2016Publication restriction:NoJudgment COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”. The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document. In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the...
showFlash = false, 6000)"
>