{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Botany Bay City Council v Minister for Planning and Infrastructure
Download as PDF
Download as Word
Highlights
My Notes
Collections
Create a New Collection
Overview
Full Text
{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Details
Case
Agency Issuance Number
Published Date
Botany Bay City Council v Minister for Planning and Infrastructure
[2015] NSWLEC 12
Tags
No tags available
Case
Botany Bay City Council v Minister for Planning and Infrastructure
[2015] NSWLEC 12
•
Land and Environment Court New South Wales Amendment notes Medium Neutral Citation: Botany Bay City Council v Minister for Planning and Infrastructure & Ors [2015] NSWLEC 12 Hearing dates:16-18 July 2014Date of orders: 10 February 2015 Decision date: 10 February 2015 Jurisdiction:Class 4Before: Beech-Jones AJ Decision: The proceedings be dismissed. The Applicant to pay the Respondents’ costs. Catchwords: Part 3A Approval – whether approved project incapable of being carried out because of interference with Council easements – whether in Class 4 proceedings the Court should assess likelihood of Supreme Court ordering the extinguishment of Council easements – whether conditions attached to approval required completion of approved project – whether threatened breach of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act if approved project not completed- whether Director – General required to consider alleged legal incapacity to complete approved project in providing report under former s 75I- whether delegate of Minister required to consider alleged legal incapacity to complete approved project in considering whether to approve project under former s 75J. Part 3A Approval – groundwater and drainage – whether delegate of Minister considered environmental assessment requirements made under former s 75F – whether overland flow path analysis required – whether overland flow path analysis provided - statement of compliance with environmental assessment requirements – no requirement under Part 3A to provide – irrelevant to validity of Director General’s report or decision to approve project. Part 3A Approval – condition of approval requiring compliance with “[u]nit size...requirements of Residential Flat Design Code” –...
Continue reading the full case
Tags
No tags available
Case
Botany Bay City Council v Minister for Planning and Infrastructure
[2015] NSWLEC 12
•
Land and Environment Court New South Wales Amendment notes Medium Neutral Citation: Botany Bay City Council v Minister for Planning and Infrastructure & Ors [2015] NSWLEC 12 Hearing dates:16-18 July 2014Date of orders: 10 February 2015 Decision date: 10 February 2015 Jurisdiction:Class 4Before: Beech-Jones AJ Decision: The proceedings be dismissed. The Applicant to pay the Respondents’ costs. Catchwords: Part 3A Approval – whether approved project incapable of being carried out because of interference with Council easements – whether in Class 4 proceedings the Court should assess likelihood of Supreme Court ordering the extinguishment of Council easements – whether conditions attached to approval required completion of approved project – whether threatened breach of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act if approved project not completed- whether Director – General required to consider alleged legal incapacity to complete approved project in providing report under former s 75I- whether delegate of Minister required to consider alleged legal incapacity to complete approved project in considering whether to approve project under former s 75J. Part 3A Approval – groundwater and drainage – whether delegate of Minister considered environmental assessment requirements made under former s 75F – whether overland flow path analysis required – whether overland flow path analysis provided - statement of compliance with environmental assessment requirements – no requirement under Part 3A to provide – irrelevant to validity of Director General’s report or decision to approve project. Part 3A Approval – condition of approval requiring compliance with “[u]nit size...requirements of Residential Flat Design Code” –...
showFlash = false, 6000)"
>