{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
BGY North Ryde Pty Ltd v City of Ryde Council
Download as PDF
Download as Word
Highlights
My Notes
Collections
Create a New Collection
Overview
Full Text
{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Details
Case
Agency Issuance Number
Published Date
BGY North Ryde Pty Ltd v City of Ryde Council
[2015] NSWLEC 1558
Tags
No tags available
Case
BGY North Ryde Pty Ltd v City of Ryde Council
[2015] NSWLEC 1558
•
Land and Environment Court New South Wales Amendment notes Medium Neutral Citation: BGY North Ryde Pty Ltd v City of Ryde Council [2015] NSWLEC 1558 Hearing dates:12 June 2015Date of orders: 12 June 2015 Decision date: 12 June 2015 Jurisdiction:Class 1Before: Registrar Gray Decision: Notice of motion dismissed, parties to bear own costs Catchwords: EXPEDITION – whether special factor exists – whether expedition warranted – financial loss an inherent risk of development appeals Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Land and Environment Court Rules 2007 Cases Cited: Healthscope Limited v The Minister for Planning and Infrastructure Number 2 [2011] NSWLEC 237 Category:Consequential orders (other than Costs)Parties: BGY North Ryde Pty Ltd (Applicant) City of Ryde Council (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Ms M Carpenter (Applicant) Solicitors: King & Wood Mallesons (Applicant) Hall & Wilcox Lawyers (Respondent) File Number(s):10298 of 2015Publication restriction:NoJudgment REGISTRAR: This matter comes before me today on a Notice of Motion filed by the applicant seeking expedition of the proceedings. The proceedings concern an appeal by the applicant following the deemed refusal of a development application by the Council. The development application itself was lodged on 6 March 2014 and was subsequently amended on 8 August 2014. The appeal commencing the proceedings was filed on 2 April 2015. The matter was before Commissioner O’Neill for a s 34 conference on 1 June 2015. Following the termination of that s 34 conference, the matter came back to the Court for further directions. Prior to the matter coming back for...
Continue reading the full case
Tags
No tags available
Case
BGY North Ryde Pty Ltd v City of Ryde Council
[2015] NSWLEC 1558
•
Land and Environment Court New South Wales Amendment notes Medium Neutral Citation: BGY North Ryde Pty Ltd v City of Ryde Council [2015] NSWLEC 1558 Hearing dates:12 June 2015Date of orders: 12 June 2015 Decision date: 12 June 2015 Jurisdiction:Class 1Before: Registrar Gray Decision: Notice of motion dismissed, parties to bear own costs Catchwords: EXPEDITION – whether special factor exists – whether expedition warranted – financial loss an inherent risk of development appeals Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Land and Environment Court Rules 2007 Cases Cited: Healthscope Limited v The Minister for Planning and Infrastructure Number 2 [2011] NSWLEC 237 Category:Consequential orders (other than Costs)Parties: BGY North Ryde Pty Ltd (Applicant) City of Ryde Council (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Ms M Carpenter (Applicant) Solicitors: King & Wood Mallesons (Applicant) Hall & Wilcox Lawyers (Respondent) File Number(s):10298 of 2015Publication restriction:NoJudgment REGISTRAR: This matter comes before me today on a Notice of Motion filed by the applicant seeking expedition of the proceedings. The proceedings concern an appeal by the applicant following the deemed refusal of a development application by the Council. The development application itself was lodged on 6 March 2014 and was subsequently amended on 8 August 2014. The appeal commencing the proceedings was filed on 2 April 2015. The matter was before Commissioner O’Neill for a s 34 conference on 1 June 2015. Following the termination of that s 34 conference, the matter came back to the Court for further directions. Prior to the matter coming back for...
showFlash = false, 6000)"
>