{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Behrooz v Secretary, Department of Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs
Download as PDF
Download as Word
Highlights
My Notes
Collections
Create a New Collection
Overview
Full Text
{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Details
Case
Agency Issuance Number
Published Date
Behrooz v Secretary, Department of Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs
[2004] HCA 36
Tags
No tags available
Case
Behrooz v Secretary, Department of Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs
[2004] HCA 36
•
HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIAGLEESON CJ,McHUGH, GUMMOW, KIRBY, HAYNE, CALLINAN AND HEYDON JJMAHRAN BEHROOZ APPELLANTANDSECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS & ORS RESPONDENTSBehrooz v Secretary of the Department of Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs[2004] HCA 366 August 2004A255/2003ORDERAppeal dismissed. Appellant to pay costs of first respondent.On appeal from the Supreme Court of South Australia Representation:J W K Burnside QC with J P Manetta for the appellant (instructed by Jeremy Moore & Associates)D M J Bennett QC, Solicitor-General of the Commonwealth, with M A Perry for the first and second respondents (instructed by Australian Government Solicitor)No appearance for the third and fourth respondentsIntervenerD S Mortimer SC with J K Kirk intervening on behalf of the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission (instructed by the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission)Notice: This copy of the Court's Reasons for Judgment is subject to formal revision prior to publication in the Commonwealth Law Reports.CATCHWORDSBehrooz v Secretary of the Department of Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous AffairsImmigration – Appellant charged with offence of escape by unlawful non-citizen from immigration detention contrary to s 197A of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – Appellant sought issue of witness summonses pursuant to Magistrates Court Act 1991 (SA) seeking production of documentary material relating to conditions and complaints about conditions at detention centre – Whether material sought by witness summonses could have assisted appellant in his defence – Whether, by reason of conditions at detention centre, it could be said that appellant did not...
Continue reading the full case
Tags
No tags available
Case
Behrooz v Secretary, Department of Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs
[2004] HCA 36
•
HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIAGLEESON CJ,McHUGH, GUMMOW, KIRBY, HAYNE, CALLINAN AND HEYDON JJMAHRAN BEHROOZ APPELLANTANDSECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AND INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS & ORS RESPONDENTSBehrooz v Secretary of the Department of Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs[2004] HCA 366 August 2004A255/2003ORDERAppeal dismissed. Appellant to pay costs of first respondent.On appeal from the Supreme Court of South Australia Representation:J W K Burnside QC with J P Manetta for the appellant (instructed by Jeremy Moore & Associates)D M J Bennett QC, Solicitor-General of the Commonwealth, with M A Perry for the first and second respondents (instructed by Australian Government Solicitor)No appearance for the third and fourth respondentsIntervenerD S Mortimer SC with J K Kirk intervening on behalf of the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission (instructed by the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission)Notice: This copy of the Court's Reasons for Judgment is subject to formal revision prior to publication in the Commonwealth Law Reports.CATCHWORDSBehrooz v Secretary of the Department of Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous AffairsImmigration – Appellant charged with offence of escape by unlawful non-citizen from immigration detention contrary to s 197A of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – Appellant sought issue of witness summonses pursuant to Magistrates Court Act 1991 (SA) seeking production of documentary material relating to conditions and complaints about conditions at detention centre – Whether material sought by witness summonses could have assisted appellant in his defence – Whether, by reason of conditions at detention centre, it could be said that appellant did not...
showFlash = false, 6000)"
>