{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Barrie v City of Sydney Council
Download as PDF
Download as Word
Highlights
My Notes
Collections
Create a New Collection
Overview
Full Text
{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Details
Case
Agency Issuance Number
Published Date
Barrie v City of Sydney Council
[2016] NSWLEC 1016
Tags
No tags available
Case
Barrie v City of Sydney Council
[2016] NSWLEC 1016
•
Land and Environment Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Barrie v City of Sydney Council [2016] NSWLEC 1016 Hearing dates:Conciliation conference on 22 January 2016Date of orders: 22 January 2016 Decision date: 22 January 2016 Jurisdiction:Class 1Before: Tuor C Decision: See (4) below Catchwords: Conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Category:Principal judgmentParties: Daniel Barrie (Applicant) City of Sydney Council (Respondent) Representation: Solicitors: Hones Lawyers (Applicant) City of Sydney Council (Respondent) File Number(s):10901 of 2015Judgment COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”. The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document. In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to, and have not, made any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in...
Continue reading the full case
Tags
No tags available
Case
Barrie v City of Sydney Council
[2016] NSWLEC 1016
•
Land and Environment Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Barrie v City of Sydney Council [2016] NSWLEC 1016 Hearing dates:Conciliation conference on 22 January 2016Date of orders: 22 January 2016 Decision date: 22 January 2016 Jurisdiction:Class 1Before: Tuor C Decision: See (4) below Catchwords: Conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Category:Principal judgmentParties: Daniel Barrie (Applicant) City of Sydney Council (Respondent) Representation: Solicitors: Hones Lawyers (Applicant) City of Sydney Council (Respondent) File Number(s):10901 of 2015Judgment COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”. The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document. In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to, and have not, made any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in...
showFlash = false, 6000)"
>