{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Baker v The Queen
Download as PDF
Download as Word
Highlights
My Notes
Collections
Create a New Collection
Overview
Full Text
{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Details
Case
Agency Issuance Number
Published Date
Baker v The Queen
[2004] HCA 45
Tags
No tags available
Case
Baker v The Queen
[2004] HCA 45
•
HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIAGLEESON CJ,McHUGH, GUMMOW, KIRBY, HAYNE, CALLINAN AND HEYDON JJALLAN BAKER APPELLANTANDTHE QUEEN RESPONDENTBaker v The Queen [2004] HCA 451 October 2004S395/2003ORDERAppeal dismissed.On appeal from the Supreme Court of New South WalesRepresentation:B W Walker SC with A P Cook for the appellant (instructed by Legal Aid Commission of New South Wales)M G Sexton SC, Solicitor-General for the State of New South Wales with R D Cogswell SC and J G Renwick for the respondent and intervening on behalf of the Attorney-General for the State of New South Wales (instructed by Crown Solicitor for New South Wales)Interveners:H C Burmester QC with N L Sharp intervening on behalf of the Attorney‑General of the Commonwealth (instructed by Australian Government Solicitor)R J Meadows QC, Solicitor-General for the State of Western Australia with K H Glancy intervening on behalf of the Attorney-General for the State of Western Australia (instructed by Crown Solicitor's Office for Western Australia)C J Kourakis QC, Solicitor-General for the State of South Australia with C D Bleby intervening on behalf of the Attorney-General for the State of South Australia (instructed by Crown Solicitor's Office for South Australia)Notice: This copy of the Court's Reasons for Judgment is subject to formal revision prior to publication in the Commonwealth Law Reports.CATCHWORDSBaker v The QueenConstitutional law (Cth) – Judicial power of Commonwealth – Vesting of federal jurisdiction in State courts – Act empowering State court to determine a minimum term and an additional term for persons serving an existing sentence of life imprisonment –...
Continue reading the full case
Tags
No tags available
Case
Baker v The Queen
[2004] HCA 45
•
HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIAGLEESON CJ,McHUGH, GUMMOW, KIRBY, HAYNE, CALLINAN AND HEYDON JJALLAN BAKER APPELLANTANDTHE QUEEN RESPONDENTBaker v The Queen [2004] HCA 451 October 2004S395/2003ORDERAppeal dismissed.On appeal from the Supreme Court of New South WalesRepresentation:B W Walker SC with A P Cook for the appellant (instructed by Legal Aid Commission of New South Wales)M G Sexton SC, Solicitor-General for the State of New South Wales with R D Cogswell SC and J G Renwick for the respondent and intervening on behalf of the Attorney-General for the State of New South Wales (instructed by Crown Solicitor for New South Wales)Interveners:H C Burmester QC with N L Sharp intervening on behalf of the Attorney‑General of the Commonwealth (instructed by Australian Government Solicitor)R J Meadows QC, Solicitor-General for the State of Western Australia with K H Glancy intervening on behalf of the Attorney-General for the State of Western Australia (instructed by Crown Solicitor's Office for Western Australia)C J Kourakis QC, Solicitor-General for the State of South Australia with C D Bleby intervening on behalf of the Attorney-General for the State of South Australia (instructed by Crown Solicitor's Office for South Australia)Notice: This copy of the Court's Reasons for Judgment is subject to formal revision prior to publication in the Commonwealth Law Reports.CATCHWORDSBaker v The QueenConstitutional law (Cth) – Judicial power of Commonwealth – Vesting of federal jurisdiction in State courts – Act empowering State court to determine a minimum term and an additional term for persons serving an existing sentence of life imprisonment –...
showFlash = false, 6000)"
>