{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Associated World Investments Pty Ltd v Wingecarribee Shire Council
Download as PDF
Download as Word
Highlights
My Notes
Collections
Create a New Collection
Overview
Full Text
{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Details
Case
Agency Issuance Number
Published Date
Associated World Investments Pty Ltd v Wingecarribee Shire Council
[2016] NSWLEC 1081
Tags
No tags available
Case
Associated World Investments Pty Ltd v Wingecarribee Shire Council
[2016] NSWLEC 1081
•
Land and Environment Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Associated World Investments Pty Ltd v Wingecarribee Shire Council [2016] NSWLEC 1081 Hearing dates:Conciliation conference on 9 December 2015Date of orders: 08 March 2016 Decision date: 08 March 2016 Jurisdiction:Class 1Before: Pearson C Decision: See (4) below Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: Demolition of existing buildings and erection of multi-dwelling housing; conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Category:Principal judgmentParties: Associated World Investments Pty Limited (Applicant) Wingecarribee Shire Council (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr M Staunton (Applicant) Solicitors: Mr J Cole, HWL Ebsworth Lawyers (Applicant) Mr C Shaw, Swaab Attorneys (Respondent) File Number(s):10743 of 2015Publication restriction:NoJudgment COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”. The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document. In making the orders to...
Continue reading the full case
Tags
No tags available
Case
Associated World Investments Pty Ltd v Wingecarribee Shire Council
[2016] NSWLEC 1081
•
Land and Environment Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Associated World Investments Pty Ltd v Wingecarribee Shire Council [2016] NSWLEC 1081 Hearing dates:Conciliation conference on 9 December 2015Date of orders: 08 March 2016 Decision date: 08 March 2016 Jurisdiction:Class 1Before: Pearson C Decision: See (4) below Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: Demolition of existing buildings and erection of multi-dwelling housing; conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Category:Principal judgmentParties: Associated World Investments Pty Limited (Applicant) Wingecarribee Shire Council (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr M Staunton (Applicant) Solicitors: Mr J Cole, HWL Ebsworth Lawyers (Applicant) Mr C Shaw, Swaab Attorneys (Respondent) File Number(s):10743 of 2015Publication restriction:NoJudgment COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”. The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document. In making the orders to...
showFlash = false, 6000)"
>