{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Ascot Project Management Pty Ltd v Northern Beaches Council
Download as PDF
Download as Word
Highlights
My Notes
Collections
Create a New Collection
Overview
Full Text
{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Details
Case
Agency Issuance Number
Published Date
Ascot Project Management Pty Ltd v Northern Beaches Council
[2016] NSWLEC 1368
Tags
No tags available
Case
Ascot Project Management Pty Ltd v Northern Beaches Council
[2016] NSWLEC 1368
•
Land and Environment Court New South Wales Case Name: Ascot Project Management Pty Ltd v Northern Beaches Council Medium Neutral Citation: [2016] NSWLEC 1368 Hearing Date(s): Conciliation conference on 24 May, 14, 20 June, 11 July, 3 August 2016 Date of Orders: 3 August 2016 Decision Date: 3 August 2016 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Hussey AC Decision: See (4) below Catchwords: Development Application: Residential flat building, water balance/ quality, access, built form, essential services, provision, landscaping; conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Ascot Project Management Pty Ltd (Applicant) Northern Beaches Council (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr N. Eastman (Respondent) Solicitors: Mr M. Sonter, Mills Oakley (Applicant) King & Wood Mallesons (Respondent) File Number(s): 2016/00150728 Publication Restriction: No JUDGMENTACTING COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s...
Continue reading the full case
Tags
No tags available
Case
Ascot Project Management Pty Ltd v Northern Beaches Council
[2016] NSWLEC 1368
•
Land and Environment Court New South Wales Case Name: Ascot Project Management Pty Ltd v Northern Beaches Council Medium Neutral Citation: [2016] NSWLEC 1368 Hearing Date(s): Conciliation conference on 24 May, 14, 20 June, 11 July, 3 August 2016 Date of Orders: 3 August 2016 Decision Date: 3 August 2016 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Hussey AC Decision: See (4) below Catchwords: Development Application: Residential flat building, water balance/ quality, access, built form, essential services, provision, landscaping; conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Ascot Project Management Pty Ltd (Applicant) Northern Beaches Council (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr N. Eastman (Respondent) Solicitors: Mr M. Sonter, Mills Oakley (Applicant) King & Wood Mallesons (Respondent) File Number(s): 2016/00150728 Publication Restriction: No JUDGMENTACTING COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s...
showFlash = false, 6000)"
>