{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
APL v Queensland Police Service
Download as PDF
Download as Word
Highlights
My Notes
Collections
Create a New Collection
Overview
Full Text
{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Details
Case
Agency Issuance Number
Published Date
APL v Queensland Police Service
[2022] QDC 214
Tags
No tags available
Case
APL v Queensland Police Service
[2022] QDC 214
•
DISTRICT COURT OF QUEENSLAND CITATION: APL v Queensland Police Service [2022] QDC 214 PARTIES: APL (appellant) v QUEENSLAND POLICE SERVICE (respondent) FILE NO/S: 1/22 DIVISION: Appellate PROCEEDING: Appeal pursuant to s 222 of the Justices Act 1886 (Qld) ORIGINATING COURT: Toowoomba Magistrates Court DELIVERED ON: 31 March 2022 (ex tempore) DELIVERED AT: Brisbane District Court HEARING DATE: 31 March 2022 JUDGE: Dearden DCJ ORDER: Appeal granted; (1) Set aside the sentences imposed at the Toowoomba Magistrates Court on 26 January 2022 in respect of charge 1 (four months imprisonment) and charge 2 (12 months imprisonment, concurrent); (2) Substitute sentences of three months imprisonment (charge 1) and four months imprisonment (charge 2), concurrent; (3) Fix a parole release date at 31 March 2022; (4) Declare the period between 26 January 2022 and 30 March 2022, a total of 64 days, as time served in respect of each of the sentences of imprisonment; (5) No order as to costs. (6) CATCHWORDS: CRIMINAL LAW – APPEAL AND NEW TRIAL – APPEAL AGAINST SENTENCE – GROUNDS FOR INTERFERENCE – SENTENCE MANIFESTLY EXCESSIVE OR INADEQUATE – where appellant convicted of two charges of contravention of a domestic violence order (aggravated) – where appellant sentenced to four months imprisonment in respect of charge 1 – where the appellant sentenced to 12 months imprisonment in respect of charge 2 – where sentences were concurrent – whether the sentence imposed was manifestly excessive LEGISLATION Justices Act 1886 (Qld) ss 222, 223 CASES ETB v Commissioner of Police [2018]...
Continue reading the full case
Tags
No tags available
Case
APL v Queensland Police Service
[2022] QDC 214
•
DISTRICT COURT OF QUEENSLAND CITATION: APL v Queensland Police Service [2022] QDC 214 PARTIES: APL (appellant) v QUEENSLAND POLICE SERVICE (respondent) FILE NO/S: 1/22 DIVISION: Appellate PROCEEDING: Appeal pursuant to s 222 of the Justices Act 1886 (Qld) ORIGINATING COURT: Toowoomba Magistrates Court DELIVERED ON: 31 March 2022 (ex tempore) DELIVERED AT: Brisbane District Court HEARING DATE: 31 March 2022 JUDGE: Dearden DCJ ORDER: Appeal granted; (1) Set aside the sentences imposed at the Toowoomba Magistrates Court on 26 January 2022 in respect of charge 1 (four months imprisonment) and charge 2 (12 months imprisonment, concurrent); (2) Substitute sentences of three months imprisonment (charge 1) and four months imprisonment (charge 2), concurrent; (3) Fix a parole release date at 31 March 2022; (4) Declare the period between 26 January 2022 and 30 March 2022, a total of 64 days, as time served in respect of each of the sentences of imprisonment; (5) No order as to costs. (6) CATCHWORDS: CRIMINAL LAW – APPEAL AND NEW TRIAL – APPEAL AGAINST SENTENCE – GROUNDS FOR INTERFERENCE – SENTENCE MANIFESTLY EXCESSIVE OR INADEQUATE – where appellant convicted of two charges of contravention of a domestic violence order (aggravated) – where appellant sentenced to four months imprisonment in respect of charge 1 – where the appellant sentenced to 12 months imprisonment in respect of charge 2 – where sentences were concurrent – whether the sentence imposed was manifestly excessive LEGISLATION Justices Act 1886 (Qld) ss 222, 223 CASES ETB v Commissioner of Police [2018]...
showFlash = false, 6000)"
>