{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Alchin v The Council of the City of Sydney
Download as PDF
Download as Word
Highlights
My Notes
Collections
Create a New Collection
Overview
Full Text
{ tooltip = 'Copied'; setTimeout(() => tooltip = 'Copy Link', 2000); })" :data-tip="tooltip" class="tooltip tooltip-primary tooltip-bottom" class="cursor-pointer" role="button">
Details
Case
Agency Issuance Number
Published Date
Alchin v The Council of the City of Sydney
[2015] NSWLEC 1302
Tags
No tags available
Case
Alchin v The Council of the City of Sydney
[2015] NSWLEC 1302
•
Land and Environment Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Alchin v The Council of the City of Sydney [2015] NSWLEC 1302 Hearing dates:Conciliation conference on 8 July 2015Date of orders: 28 July 2015 Decision date: 28 July 2015 Jurisdiction:Class 1Before: Brown ASC Decision: See (5) below Catchwords: MODIFICATION APPLICATION: modification of existing consent to provide a movable awning; conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Category:Principal judgmentParties: John Alchin (Applicant) The Council of the City of Sydney (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Ms Christina Renner (Applicant) Ms Kirsten Morrin (Respondent) Solicitors: GADENS Lawyers (Applicant) The Council of the City of Sydney (Respondent) File Number(s):10456 of 2015Publication restriction:NoJudgment COMMISSIONER: This is an appeal against the refusal of modification application D/2014/757/A to allow a movable awning to the western terrace of 7/22-24 Macleay Street, Elizabeth Bay. In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”. The Court Act also required me...
Continue reading the full case
Tags
No tags available
Case
Alchin v The Council of the City of Sydney
[2015] NSWLEC 1302
•
Land and Environment Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Alchin v The Council of the City of Sydney [2015] NSWLEC 1302 Hearing dates:Conciliation conference on 8 July 2015Date of orders: 28 July 2015 Decision date: 28 July 2015 Jurisdiction:Class 1Before: Brown ASC Decision: See (5) below Catchwords: MODIFICATION APPLICATION: modification of existing consent to provide a movable awning; conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Category:Principal judgmentParties: John Alchin (Applicant) The Council of the City of Sydney (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Ms Christina Renner (Applicant) Ms Kirsten Morrin (Respondent) Solicitors: GADENS Lawyers (Applicant) The Council of the City of Sydney (Respondent) File Number(s):10456 of 2015Publication restriction:NoJudgment COMMISSIONER: This is an appeal against the refusal of modification application D/2014/757/A to allow a movable awning to the western terrace of 7/22-24 Macleay Street, Elizabeth Bay. In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”. The Court Act also required me...
showFlash = false, 6000)"
>